ISSN 2410-3594
e-ISSN 2786-7382
UDC 34; 159.9
Scientific Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs
- temporary access to things and documents, party of criminal proceedings, accusation, defense
- https://doi.org/10.56215/01211214.66
- Pages 66-73
The article contains the main recommendations for improving the activities of the prosecution and the defense in criminal proceedings during the security measure – temporary access to things and documents. During the investigation, the prosecutor, investigator, in almost every proceeding there is a need to seize any media evidence of the crime. In turn, defenders are also increasingly using their powers to provide temporary access to things and documents. The practice of applying this measure to ensure criminal proceedings shows a large number of mistakes made by the parties to the criminal proceedings, as a result of which this measure is not carried out, the court refuses to make a decision and, accordingly, the goal is not achieved. The purpose of the article is to improve the quality of temporary access to things and documents by the parties to criminal proceedings, to obtain a positive practice of court decisions on its conduct and to obtain results to ensure the tasks of criminal proceedings. Methodology. To achieve this goal, the formal-logical method, system-structural, comparative-legal and statistical methods are used. Scientific novelty. A comparison of procedural and tactical capabilities of different parties in the field of criminal proceedings – prosecution and defense. The characteristic mistakes made by them in carrying out their activities during temporary access to things and documents are highlighted. In view of this, proposals have been made to improve both the general tactics inherent in both sides of the process and specific tactical and procedural actions and techniques specific to each individual. Conclusions. A number of recommendations have been received for prosecutors, investigators and lawyers whose purpose is to improve the quality of activities of the parties to criminal proceedings during temporary access to things and documents
References
[1] Avilkina and Others v. Russia (Application No. 1585/09) Judgment Strasburg 6 June 2013. Section I. (2020). Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=002-7612.
[2] Bem, M. (2020). Obtaining access to things and documents in the light of the practice of the ECHR. Retrieved from https://vkp.ua/publication/otrimannya-dostupudo-rechey-i-dokumentiv-u-svitli-praktiki-iespl.
[3] Bespalko, I.L. (2020) Implementation of proportionality in the application of measures to ensure criminal proceedings. Actual Problems of Domestic Jurisprudence, 2, 119-124. doi: 10.15421/392057.
[4] Cherniavskyi, S.S., & Finahieiev, V.O. (2013). Problems of temporary access to information contained in telecommunications operators and providers. Law Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, 1, 179-185.
[5] Domashenko, O.M. (2020). Classification of tactical errors in investigative activity. Retrieved from http:// nauka.nlu.edu.ua/download/diss/Domashenko/d_Domashenko.pdf
[6] Dudko, O.V. (2020) Errors of the lawyer in criminal proceedings. Retrieved from http://elar.naiau.kiev. ua/jspui/bitstream/123456789/17644/1/dysert_dudko.pdf
[7] Hlushko, I., & Moiseieva, A. (2020). Temporary access to things and documents: What to remember. Retrieved from https://golaw.ua/ua/insights/publication/timchasovijdostup-do-rechej-ta-dokumentivpro-shho-varto-pamyatati/
[8] Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine. No. 4651-VI. (2012, April). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada. gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17#Text
[9] Kuzubova, T.O., & Yukhno, O.O. (2019). Temporary access to things and documents: Theoretical and applied problems monograph. Kharkiv: Panov A.M.
[10] Lysachenko, Ye.I. (2019). On some issues of regulation of the powers of the investigating judge
[11] to consider requests for temporary access to things and documents. Bulletin of Criminal Proceedings, 3, 215-223. doi: 10.17721/2413-5372.2019.3/215-223.
[12] Lysachenko, Ye.I. (2021). Temporary access to things and documents as a means of criminal procedural evidence. Retrieved from http://elar.naiau.kiev.ua/jspui/bitstream/123456789/18799/6/dis.pdf
[13] M.N. and Others v. San Marino (Application No. 28005/12). (2015, July). Retrieved from https:// hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-155819.
[14] Malone v. The United Kingdom (Application No. 8691/79). (1984, August). Retrieved from https:// hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf?library=ECHR&id=00173570&filename=MALON%20 v.%20THE%20UNITED%20KINGDOM.pdf.
[15] Mykhailenko, V. (2021). Practical aspects of temporary access to things and documents at the request of the defense and the victim. (2020). Retrieved from https://yur-gazeta.com/publications/practice/ sudovapraktika/praktichni-aspekti-timchasovogo-dostupu-dorechey-i-dokumentiv-za-klopotannyamizahistu-ipoterpilog.html
[16] Mykhailenko, V. (2021). Temporary access to things and documents at the request of the defense and the victim. Retrieved from https://yur-gazeta.com/publications/practice/sudova-praktika/timchasoviydostup-dorechey-i-dokumentiv-za-klopotannyami-zahistu-i-poterpilogo.html
[17] Problems of application of the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine concerning certain investigative (search) actions and measures to ensure criminal proceedings, in particular, search and temporary access to things and documents. (2020). Retrieved from https://zib.com.ua/ua/ print/41323problemi_zastosuvannya_polozhen_kriminalnogo_procesualnogo_k.html
[18] Rohatiuk, I.V. (2016). Procedural activity of the prosecutor at the stage of pre-trial investigation. Kyiv: National Academy of Internal Affairs.
[19] Sukhachova, I.О. (2021). Use by the prosecutor of temporary access to things and documents during the implementation of the prosecution function. Legal Journal of Donbass, 1(74), 133-142. doi: 10.32366/2523-4269-2021-74-1-133-142.
[20] Excerpt Supreme Specialized Court of Ukraine for Civil and Criminal Cases “Generalization of case law on the consideration by the investigating judge of motions for the application of measures to ensure criminal proceedings”. (2014, February). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/ n0001740-14#Text.
[21] Law of Ukraine “About advocacy and advocacy”. No. 5076-VI. (2012, July). Retrieved from https:// zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/5076-17#Text.
[22] Zinkovskyi, I.P., & Hloviuk, I.V. (2020). Powers of the investigator in the election, change and abolition of measures to ensure criminal proceedings: Doctrine and practice monograph. Odesa: Helvetyka.