en

Scientific Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs

  • Home
  • Vol. 31, No. 1, 2026

  • Constructivist framework for analysing the criminal liability of officials for abuse in the energy market as a threat to Ukraine’s critical infrastructure

  • Received 28.10.2025,
  • Revised 26.01.2026,
  • Accepted 31.03.2026
  • Published 02.04.2026
Download article Download article
Vol. 31, No. 1, 2026
  • national security; legal regulation; legislative gaps; strategic facilities; privatisation processes; energy infrastructure; energy market
  • https://doi.org/10.63341/naia-herald/1.2026.104
  • Pages 104-118

The purpose of the study was to determine to what extent the current model of criminal liability of officials in the energy market is effective and relevant to modern security challenges in the field of critical infrastructure. The research methodology combined historical-legal, systemic-structural, and discourse analysis of Ukrainian normative legal acts, as well as analytical reports. The research established that the current system of criminal-legal protection is a consequence of historical inertia and has inherited the shortcomings of the Soviet model, which was oriented towards ideological rather than technogenic threats. It was revealed that the general articles of criminal legislation on official crimes are qualitatively incapable of reflecting the specificity and scale of potential harm, as they are oriented towards individual consequences, rather than the threat of systemic collapse resulting from attacks on vital systems. It was proven that the privatisation processes in the 1990s created a gap in defining the subjects of liability among managers of private energy infrastructure operators. A significant gap was identified between outdated legal norms and new societal security expectations, formed under the influence of full-scale war. The conclusions were that the existing system of criminal liability is ineffective and requires immediate reform. The urgent necessity for developing and implementing into the Criminal Code specialised criminal offences with sanctions proportionate to the level of public danger of such acts was substantiated; this is intended to enhance the state’s resilience and ensure the inevitability of punishment. The practical significance of the study lies in the fact that its results can be used by law-making bodies to develop effective legal mechanisms to protect the energy market as a subject of influence on the critical infrastructure of Ukraine

References

  1. ACTED. (2020). Analytical report “The status of Ukrainian legislation regulating environmental and technogenic risks in the context of the priorities of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction”. Retrieved from https://archive.r2p.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/report_on_eco_tech_risks_3p-consortium.pdf.
  2. Aebi, S., Hauri, A., & Kamberaj, J. (2024). Critical infrastructure resilience in Ukraine: Energy, transportation, and communication. Zürich: Center for Security Studies. doi: 10.3929/ethz-b-000662463.
  3. Borovyk, A., Tkachenko, I., Derevyanko, N., & Diakin, Y. (2023). Public official as a victim of criminal insult and defamation: Comparative research. Cuestiones Políticas, 41(78). doi: 10.46398/cuestpol.4178.50.
  4. Buckley, M. (2025). Constructivism. In Encyclopedia of global justice (pp. 1-4). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  5. Chernousov, V.S. (2021). Legal regulation of the ethics of behaviour of civil servants. Retrieved from http://repository.mu.edu.ua/jspui/bitstream/123456789/3056/1/%D0%A7%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%83%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%B2%20%D0%92.%D0%A1_.pdf.  
  6. Council of Europe Office in Ukraine. (2015). Revolution of dignity. Retrieved from https://www.coe.int/en/web/kyiv/report-on-maidan-investigations.
  7. Durojaye, H., & Raji, O. (2022). Impact of state and state sponsored actors on the cyber environment and the future of critical infrastructure. arXiv. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.08036.
  8. European Parliament. (2022). Russia’s war against Ukraine: A chronology of cyberattacks. Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2022/733549/EPRS_BRI(2022)733549_XL.pdf.
  9. Fedyuk, V. (2025). Critically important infrastructure objects (part 2, article 259 of the criminal code of Ukraine) as a circumstances aggressing criminal liability. Propylaea of Law and Security, 6-7, 103-105.
  10. Gerasimenko, O.M. (2024). Critical infrastructure of Ukraine as a subject of scientific knowledge: Theoretical aspect. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University. Series: Law, 4(85), 42-49. doi: 10.24144/2307-3322.2024.85.4.6.
  11. Gorbatenko, V.P., & Kukuruz, O.V. (2021). Construction of political and legal reality: Theory, methodology, practice. Lawful State, (32), 475-481. doi: 10.33663/0869-2491-2021-32-475-481.
  12. Ilic, G. (2023). “International legal aspects of the critical infrastructure protection against contemporary security threats” ‒ Vesna Poposka. Contemporary Macedonian Defense/Sovremena Makedonska Odbrana, 23(45).
  13. Kondratov, S.I., & Sukhodolia, O.M. (2020). The state critical infrastructure protection system in the national security system: The analytical report. Kyiv: NISS.
  14. Kostakopoulou, D. (2024). Constructivist approaches and institutional constructivism in EU legal scholarship. In Interdisciplinary research methods in EU law (pp. 265-278). London: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  15. Kratochwil, F., & Peltonen, H. (2022). Constructivism. In Oxford research encyclopedias: Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  16. Kucherina, S.E., & Oleinikov, D.O. (2021). Current status of criminal law protection of critical infrastructure facilities. Information and Law, 1(36), 90-98. doi: 10.37750/2616-6798.2021.1(36).238187.
  17. Larrinaga, C., & Bebbington, J. (2021). The pre-history of sustainability reporting: A constructivist reading. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34(9), 162-181. doi: 10.1108/AAAJ-03-2017-2872.
  18. Locatelli, A. (2021). Critical infrastructure protection. In Technology and international relations (pp. 152-172). London: Edward Elgar Publishing. doi: 10.4337/9781788976077.00016.
  19. Matczak, A. (2024). Who is “the public” when we talk about crime?: Interpreting and framing public voices in criminology. In Marginalised voices in criminology (pp. 166-181). London: Routledge.
  20. McCourt, D.M. (2022). The new constructivism in international relations theory. Bristol: Policy Press.
  21. Meli, K., Koliopoulos, D., & Lavidas, K. (2022). A model-based constructivist approach for bridging qualitative and quantitative aspects in teaching and learning the first law of thermodynamics. Science & Education, 31(2), 451-485. doi: 10.1007/s11191-021-00262-7.
  22. Minakov, M. (2023). War, de-oligarchization, and the possibility of anti-patronal transformation in Ukraine. In B. Madlovics & B. Magyar (Eds.), Ukraine’s patronal democracy and the russian invasion (pp. 141-165). Budapest: Central European University Press. doi: 10.1515/9789633866641-007e.
  23. Nugroho, B.W. (2024). Constructivist approach to the exchange of power in search of the possibility of the Russo-Ukraine conflict settlement. International Journal of Social Science, Education, Communication and Economics (SINOMICS JOURNAL), 3(2), 245-260.
  24. Ocieczek, G. (2024). Selected legal aspects of national security and critical infrastructure protection in the European Union with particular reference to the Polish national legislation. In Shielding Europe with the common security and defence policy: The EU legal framework for the development of an innovative European defence industry in times of a changing global security environment (pp. 803-839). Budapest: Central European Academic Publishing.
  25. Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2024). Attacks on Ukraine’s energy infrastructure: Harm to the civilian population. Retrieved from https://ukraine.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/2024-09/ENGAttacksonUkraine’sEnergyInfrastructure-Harm to the Civilian Population.pdf.
  26. OSCE. (2004). Ukrainian presidential elections October 31, November 21 and December 26, 2004. Retrieved from https://www.cvk.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/2004_osce_pu.pdf
  27. Pardede, J.N., & Poluakan, P.H. (2021). Law and post-truth: Critical constructivism as an ideal legal reasoning method on Indonesia’s post-truth era society. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi, 4(1).
  28. Park, S. (2023). Constructivism. In International organization and global governance (pp. 133-143). London: Routledge.
  29. Roman, Ł., & Cygańczuk, K. (2022). Legal dimension of the protection of critical infrastructure ‒ selected aspects. Safety & Fire Technology, 59(1), 166-181. doi: 10.12845/sft.59.1.2022.10.
  30. Sallinen, M. (2021). Weaponized malware, physical damage, zero casualties–what informal norms are emerging in targeted state-sponsored cyber-attacks?: The dynamics beyond causation: An interpretivist-constructivist analysis of the US media discourse regarding offensive cyber operations and cyber weapons between 2010 and 2020. (Master’s thesis, Swedish Defence University, Stocholm, Sweden).
  31. Snelbecker, D. (1995). The political economy of privatization in Ukraine. CASE Network Studies and Analyses, 59. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1476267.
  32. Sokurenko, V.V. (2023). Current state and prospects for the development of Ukrainian criminology. Bulletin of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 30(3), 336-356. doi: 10.31359/1993-0909-2023-30-3-336.
  33. Ternavska, A.A., & Turlova, Y.A. (2024). Criminality in the field of radioecological safety as an object of criminological research. Bulletin of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 31(2), 283-302. doi: 10.31359/1993-0909-2024-31-2-283.
  34. Tychyna, D.M. (2025). Peculiarities of criminal liability of officials of legal entities of private law for corruption crimes in the sphere of official activity. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University. Series: Law, 3(89), 281-287. doi: 10.24144/2307-3322.2025.89.3.42.
  35. Vozniuk, A., Kamensky, D., Dudorov, O., Movchan, R., & Andrushko, A. (2021). Unconstitutionality of criminal liability for filing inaccurate information in Ukraine: Critical legal analyses. Cuestionas Politicas, 39(69), 133-145. doi: 10.46398/cuestpol.3969.07.
  36. Wijesinghe, H., Suduwelikanda, D., & Karunasena, V. (2024). Ukraine-Russia war and the neighborhood: Understanding Russia-Eastern Europe relations through constructivist perspective. Spectrum: Journal of Global Studies. Retrieved from https://ss.kln.ac.lk/depts/intlSt/media/attachments/2024/03/21/journal-of-global-studies-2024---march-final.pdf#page=27
  37. Yigit, Y., Ferrag, M.A., Sarker, I.H., Maglaras, L.A., Chrysoulas, C., Moradpoor, N., & Janicke, H. (2024). Critical infrastructure protection: Generative AI, challenges, and opportunities. arXiv. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.04874.