ISSN 2410-3594
e-ISSN 2786-7382
UDC 34; 159.9
Scientific Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs
- admissibility of evidence; documentation of covert investigative (search) actions; involvement of individuals; time limits; law enforcement officers; declassification
- https://doi.org/10.63341/naia-herald/3.2025.74
- Pages 74-86
For the effective investigation of serious or particularly serious crimes, covert investigative (search) actions are conducted, involving individuals who confidentially cooperate with law enforcement agencies. This study aimed to examine the legal parameters governing the admissibility of the results of covert investigative (search) actions as a particularly sensitive form of evidence collection, with emphasis on balancing operational expediency and procedural legality within criminal proceedings. The methodological basis of the study included a systematic analysis of Ukrainian legislative acts, as well as comparative legal methods, which made it possible to assess the effectiveness of the practical application of legislative provisions. In the context of insufficient legislative regulation of confidential cooperation with law enforcement bodies, it was necessary to analyse potential errors that may lead to the recognition of evidence as inadmissible. Attention was drawn to the possibility of conducting covert investigative (search) actions solely during the investigation of crimes of a certain degree of gravity, and subject to the proper procedure for obtaining the necessary authorisation. The article also highlighted the need for proper formalisation of the involvement of individuals confidentially cooperating with law enforcement authorities in covert investigative (search) actions, and outlines the information that must be specified in the ruling authorising such a decision. Issues concerning the declassification of protocols prepared on the basis of covert investigative (search) actions and the decisions authorising their conduct have been examined, with particular attention given to the absence of a mechanism for declassifying rulings of an investigating judge granting permission for such actions and the problems arising as a result. A mechanism has been proposed for verifying the legality of covert investigative (search) actions in cases where no ruling by an investigating judge exists to authorise such actions, or where such a ruling remains classified. The problematic issues explored in this article, together with the specified conditions for using the evidence obtained, provide a useful tool for the practical work of detectives, investigators, and operational units of law enforcement agencies
References
[1] Bahrii, M.V., & Lutsyk, V.V. (2017). Procedural aspects of covert information gathering: Domestic and foreign experience. Kharkiv: Pravo.
[2] Domin, Yu.M. (2018). Certain aspects of the use of results of covert investigative (search) actions. Legal Ukraine, 8, 31-39.
[3] Dragojlović, J., & Filipović, N. (2022). Undercover investigator in legislation of the United States and the United Kingdom. Culture of Polissia, 19(1), 62-78. doi: 10.51738/Kpolisa2022.19.1r.4df.
[4] Drozdova, O.V., & Zaritska, K.H. (2021). Investigating judge as a guarantor of ensuring the legality and justification of restrictions on constitutional human rights and freedoms during covert investigative (search) actions (CISA). Scientific Papers of the National University “Odessa Law Academy”, 29, 98-107. doi: 10.32837/npnuola.v28i29.721.
[5] Fuller, L. (1999). The morality of law. Kyiv: Sphera.
[6] Heselev, O.V. (2019). Problematic issues of declassification and use in criminal proceedings of decisions of an investigating judge on the permission to hold secret investigators (wanted) actions. Legal Ukraine, 3, 29-38.
[7] Higher Anti-Corruption Court. (2021). Generalisation of judicial practice on the consideration by investigating judges of the High Anti-Corruption Court of applications for permission to conduct covert investigative (search) actions and operational-search measures. Retrieved from https://hcac.court.gov.ua/userfiles/media/new_folder_for_uploads/hcac/statistics/reviews/review_CIA_OSM.pdf.
[8] Kaplina, O.V. (2024). Proper recording of carrying out of covert investigatory (detective) actions as a prerequisite for using their results as evidence in law enforcement activities. Legal Scientific Electronic Journal, 5, 441-445. doi: 10.32782/2524-0374/2024-5/109.
[9] Kohut, A.A. (2024). On the justification of classifying materials related to covert investigative (search) actions as state secrets. Legal Scientific Electronic Journal, 2, 426-428. doi: 10.32782/2524-0374/2024-2/105.
[10] Kret, H.R. (2021). Use of the results of covert investigative (search) actions in criminal proceedings. Scientific Notes of the V.I. Vernadsky Tavria National University. Series: Legal Sciences, 4, 88-93. doi: 10.32838/TNU-2707-0581/2021.4/14.
[11] Kudinov, S.S., Shekhavtsov, R.M., Drozdov, O.M., & Hrynenko, S.O. (2015). Covert investigative (search) activities and the use of the results of operational-search activities in criminal proceedings. Kharkiv: Oberih.
[12] Kulitska, N. (2025). Problems of normative and legal regulation of engaging lawyers in confidential cooperation. KELM, 1(69), 172-179. doi: 10.51647/kelm.2025.1.25.
[13] Matijašević, J., & Zarubica, S. (2020). Types and conditions for the application of special investigative measures and preventive security measures by security services. Pravo – Teorija i Praksa, 37(4), 26-41. doi: 10.5937/ptp2004026M.
[14] Panov, A.V., & Tyshchenko, D.R. (2024). Admissibility of evidence in echr practice as a guarantee of a fair trial. Legal Scientific Electronic Journal, 3, 476-478. doi: 10.32782/2524-0374/2024-3/114.
[15] Pohoretskyi, M.M. (2023). Guarantees of human rights when interfering in private communication during confidential investigations in the practice of the security service of Ukraine: Problem issues. Criminal Justice Bulletin, 3-4, 103-122. doi: 10.17721/2413-5372.2023.3-4/103-122.
[16] Serhieieva, D. (2016). Use of the results of covert investigative (search) activities in evidence: on improving the provisions of the current Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. South Ukrainian Law Journal, 1, 105-107.
[17] Serhieieva, D. (2017). The applying of the results of secret investigative (search) actions to obtain certain types of evidence in criminal proceeding: Problematic issues. Law of Ukraine, 12, 49-61.
[18] Shapoval, O.V. (2025). Topical issues of ensuring guarantees of legal professional activity during the conduct of covert investigative (detective) actions against defense attorneys in criminal proceedings. Legal Scientific Electronic Journal, 7, 214-216. doi: 10.32782/2524-0374/2025-7/48.
[19] Shcherbyna, L. (2024). Consequences of non-disclosure of the investigative judge’s approvals, on the basis of which covert investigative (search) action, operational search and counter-intelligence measures were carry out, for criminal procedural evidence. Law Journal, 3, 294-304. doi: 10.32782/yuv.v3.2024.36.
[20] Tahiiev, S.R., Puzyrov, M.S., & Ivashko, S.V. (2023). Covert investigative (search) activities in war conditions: Selected theoretical and practical aspects (part II). Electronic Scientific Publication “Analytical and Comparative Law”, 2, 454-459. doi: 10.24144/2788-6018.2023.02.79.
[21] Talyzina Ya.O. (2022). Regulatory support and implementation of confidential cooperation in criminal proceedings. (Doctoral dissertation, Research Institute for the Study of Crime Problems Named After Academician V.V. Stashys National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine).
[22] Volobuiev, A.F., & Smokov, S.M. (2025). Procedural terms in criminal proceedings: Problematic issues. Electronic scientific Publication “Analytical and Comparative Law”, 1, 702-707. doi: 10.24144/2788-6018.2025.01.117.