- forensic activity; investigation of crimes; differentiation; evidence process; violations of the laws and customs of war; characteristics; international justice
- https://doi.org/10.63341/naia-herald/3.2025.87
- Pages 87-97
The relevance of the study was determined by the need to improve the forensic systematisation of war crimes in view of the current challenges and scale of criminal activity during the armed conflict in Ukraine, as well as the problems of investigating them in conditions of aggression. The aim of the study was to substantiate the expediency of distinguishing between war crimes according to criminal law and forensic criteria, as well as to form the basis for their criminalistic classification, taking into account the criminal law and criminalistic aspects of the acts under investigation. The methodological tools of the study included a set of methods, among which were formal-legal, comparative-legal, inductive, comparative, forecasting and forensic analysis methods to substantiate conclusions and provide recommendations on the subject of the study. The results of the study consisted in substantiating the criminal classification of war crimes as a necessary component (element) of the criminalistic methodology for investigating criminal offences. The classification criteria for differentiating war crimes by type of armed conflict, territorial factor of commission, methods of criminal activity, nature and scale of socially dangerous consequences, features of the subjective composition of the offence, as well as motivational and target-oriented guidelines for the behaviour of the perpetrators are substantiated. The importance of aggravating circumstances was highlighted, which, despite the absence of direct confirmation in the disposition of Article 438 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, are of key importance for identifying the degree of individual responsibility. This refers to cases of the formation and implementation of criminal intent through the issuance of orders, the development of plans or strategies for committing war crimes, initiated at the highest level of the military and political leadership of the aggressor state. Emphasis is placed on the advisability of amendments and additions to Article 438 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine with the expansion of the list of aggravating circumstances, in particular if war crimes are committed against children or have negative consequences for the gene pool of the nation. The scientific novelty and practical significance of the results obtained lies in the formation of effective mechanisms for investigating war crimes through the analysis of criminal law, criminal procedure and criminalistic aspects of investigating violations of the laws and customs of war, as well as during the improvement of criminal legislation at both the national and international levels
References
[1] Agarkova, O. (2024). Detection and recording of violations of the laws and customs of war – a direction of law enforcement agenciesʼ activities. Scientific Bulletin of the International Humanitarian University. Series: Jurisprudence, 68, 78-82. doi: 10.32782/2307-1745.2024.68.16.
[2] Basysta, I., Vlasova, G., & Stratonov, V. (2023). Prospects and inevitability of responsibility for the commission of war crimes, genocide, aggression and crimes against humanity (activities of the Joint Investigation Team to investigate serious international crimes in Ukraine (JIT); cooperation with the International Criminal Court; prospects for the creation of an AD HOC International Tribunal, etc.). In War crimes and war crimes: Prerequisites, theory and practice (pp. 25-72). Riga: Baltija Publishing. doi: 10.30525/978-9934-26-302-6-2.
[3] Didenko, E. (2024). Criminal-legal and procedural characteristics of war crimes in Ukraine (after the full-scale invasion of the Russian Federation into Ukraine). Electronic Scientific Publication “Analytical and Comparative Law”, 2, 569-573. doi: 10.24144/2788-6018.2024.02.96.
[4] Harasymov, O., Marko, S., & Ryashko, O. (2025). How to punish war criminals in Ukraine: Mechanisms for restoring justice. doi: 10.30525/978-9934-26-302-6-8.
[5] Hlovyuk, I., & Teteryatnyk, G. (2022). Contextual elements in war crimes proceedings: A sui generis subject of proof. Legal Scientific Electronic Journal, 6, 394-398. doi: 10.32782/2524-0374/2022-6/87.
[6] In Mariupol, the invaders killed about 100 thousand people – human rights activists. Ukrinform. (2023). Retrieved from https://surl.li/boucwj.
[7] Kostiuk, I. (2024). Theoretical legal analysis of abuse of power or official authority by a military official in martial law or combat situation: Key aspects. Scientific Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, 29(4), 61-74. doi: 10.56215/naia-herald/4.2024.61.
[8] Kovalenko, A. (2022). Some legal and organizational problems of collecting, researching and using evidence during the investigation of criminal offenses under martial law. In Issues of documentation, determination of damage and compensation for losses caused to Ukraine and its citizens as a result of the armed aggression of the Russian Federation: Proceedings of a scientific and practical conference (pp. 114- 117). Kharkiv: New Law University named after Ya. Mudry.
[9] Ostapchuk, L., & Kuzmenko, T. (2022). Military and war crimes in domestic and international legislation. Criminal and Executive System: Yesterday. Today. Tomorrow, 1(11), 18-27. doi: 10.32755/sjcriminal.2022.01.018.
[10] Paleshko, Ya., Kubetska, O., & Ostapenko, T. (2020). Concept and classification of crimes related to the economic sphere. Scientific Notes of V.I. Vernadsky TNU. Series: Legal Sciences, 31(70), 70-75. doi: 10.32838/TNU-2707-0581/2020.5/13.
[11] Pchelina, O., & Pchelin, V. (2022). Forensic classification of war crimes. In Modern trends in the development of forensics and criminal process under martial law: Proceedings of the scientific and practical conference (334-338). Kharkiv: Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs.
[12] Pchelina, O., (2014). Forensic classification of crimes in the sphere of official activity. National Legal Journal: Theory and Practice, 6, 267-271.
[13] Prosecutor Generalʼs Office. (2022). Unified report on criminal offenses for January-December 2022. Retrieved from https://gp.gov.ua/ua/posts/pro-zareyestrovani-kriminalni-pravoporushennya-ta-rezultati-yih-dosudovogo-rozsliduvannya-2.
[14] Prosecutor Generalʼs Office. (2023). Unified report on criminal offenses for January-December 2023. Retrieved from https://gp.gov.ua/ua/posts/pro-zareyestrovani-kriminalni-pravoporushennya-ta-rezultati-yih-dosudovogo-rozsliduvannya-2.
[15] Prosecutor Generalʼs Office. (2024). Unified report on criminal offenses for January-December 2024. Retrieved from https://gp.gov.ua/ua/posts/pro-zareyestrovani-kriminalni-pravoporushennya-ta-rezultati-yih-dosudovogo-rozsliduvannya-2.
[16] Repchonok, A. (2020). Concept, features and classification of crimes in the sphere of economy. State and Regions, 2(68), 278-284. doi: 10.32840/1813-338X-2020.2.47.
[17] Report on the state of administration of justice by local and appellate courts for 2022. (2022). Retrieved from https://court.gov.ua/inshe/sudova_statystyka/.
[18] Report on the state of administration of justice by local and appellate courts for 2023. (2023). Retrieved from https://court.gov.ua/inshe/sudova_statystyka/.
[19] Report on the state of administration of justice by local and appellate courts for 2024. (2024). Retrieved from https://court.gov.ua/inshe/sudova_statystyka/.
[20] Rubanenko, N. (2024). Concept, typology and characteristics of international crimes: Systematic analysis. Law Forum, 79(2), 84-95. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10933562.
[21] Rubanenko, N. (2024). Conceptual foundations of international legal proceedings. Scientific Bulletin of the Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, 2(105), 160-175. doi: 10.32631/v.2024.2.38.
[22] Shulzhenko, A. (2022). Problems of proving the objective side in crimes of violation of the laws and customs of war. Bulletin of the Luhansk State University of Internal Affairs named after E.O. Didorenko, 2(98), 261-270. doi: 10.33766/2524-0323.98.261-270.
[23] Tchobo, D.L.R. (2022). Potential international crimes in Ukraine: Should atroci-ties in Bucha be classified as genocide, war crimes, or crimes against humanity? Law and Safety, 2(85), 13-20. doi: 10.32631/pb.2022.2.01.
[24] Tolkach, A. (2023). Forensic characteristics of war crimes committed by the Russian army against the civilian population in the Chernihiv region from February 24 to April 2. Electronic Scientific Publication “Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence”, 4, 413-417. doi: 10.24144/2788-6018.2023.04.66.
[25] Trautman, L.J., & McFarlin, M. (2023). Putin, Russia and Ukraine: International human rights violations, war crimes, & future implications. SSRN. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4393282.
[26] Tymoshenko, V. (2024). Use of special knowledge during documentation and investigation of war crimes. Bulletin of the Forensic Association of Ukraine, 1(31), 307-314. doi: 10.32631/vca.2024.1.25.
[27] UN Confirms more than 6,300 civilian deaths in Ukraine since Russiaʼs invasion. (2022). Retrieved from https://www.ukrinform.net/rubric-ato/3598541-un-confirms-more-than-6300-civilian-deaths-in-ukraine-since-russias-invasion-started.html.
[28] Yevgeny Yenin: More than 9,400 civilians have already died from the shelling of the occupiers. (2022). Retrieved from https://ukurier.gov.ua/uk/news/yevgenij-yenin-vid-obstriliv-okupantiv-zaginulo-vz/.