en

Scientific Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs

  • Received 22.01.2025,
  • Revised 23.04.2025,
  • Accepted 27.05.2025
Download article Download article
Vol. 30, No. 2, 2025
  • alternative dispute resolution; conflict resolution; mediation; comparative mediation; civil proceedings
  • https://doi.org/10.63341/naia-herald/2.2025.66
  • Pages 66-75

The relevance of this study stems from the need to enhance the effectiveness of dispute resolution in civil proceedings in Ukraine and the Federal Republic of Germany through the use of alternative methods, particularly mediation. This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive examination of the application of mediation in the civil process in both Ukraine and Germany. Attention was focused on identifying legal and procedural barriers to its effective implementation and formulating proposals to improve the relevant legal frameworks of both countries. The methodological basis of the research included formal legal, comparative legal, and systemic-structural analysis, as well as case analysis. These methods enabled the examination of legal acts, judicial practice, and doctrinal approaches in both jurisdictions. Despite ongoing reforms in both legal systems, challenges remain in institutionalising mediation mechanisms – particularly regarding legislative gaps, the enforcement of mediation agreements, and judicial encouragement of dispute settlement. The findings indicated that in Germany, the use of mediation is systematically integrated into civil proceedings. This is attributed to the existence of a coherent legal framework, well-trained mediators, and judicial support for the voluntary resolution of disputes. In Ukraine, despite the adoption of relevant legal acts, the practical application of mediation remains fragmented and insufficiently developed. This is largely due to the absence of unified standards, a low level of awareness among legal professionals, and limited institutional support. The comparative analysis showed that Germany’s experience may be beneficial for Ukraine – particularly in terms of raising qualification requirements for mediators, developing court-annexed mediation, and strengthening public trust in alternative dispute resolution. The practical significance of the study lies in the formulation of scientifically grounded proposals for optimising mediation within the civil justice system. These recommendations may be utilised by legislators, judges, and legal practitioners to improve access to justice and reduce the burden on the judiciary through the development of an effective mediation infrastructure

References

[1] Ali, M. (2021). Urgensi integrasi dan implementasi maslahah dalam proses mediasi. Al Adalah, 22(1), 13-27. doi: 10.35719/aladalah.v22i1.7.

[2] Barth, G., & Barth, J. (Eds.). (2023). The Mediation. Mediation from the perspective of Ukraine and European Union. Leipzig: Steinbeis Beratungszentren GmbH.

[3] Council of Europe. (2024). Evaluation of the judicial systems 2024 (data 2022): Germany. Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/germany-2024-2022-/1680b1f6d2.

[4] Current decisions of the Federal Court of Justice. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://juris.bundesgerichtshof.de/cgi-bin/rechtsprechung/list.py?Gericht=bgh&Art=en&Datum=Aktuell&Sort=12288.

[5] Deutscher Anwaltverein. (2022). Retrieved from https://anwaltverein.de/de/.

[6] Dontsov, D.Y. (2022). Mediation as a means of dispute resolution in the civil proceedings of Ukraine and France. South Ukrainian Law Journal, 1(4), 123-128. doi: 10.32850/sulj.2022.4.1.20.

[7] European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. (2025). Country report: Ukraine. Retrieved from https://www.ebrd.com/content/dam/ebrd_dxp/assets/pdfs/legal-reform/dispute-resolution/country-reports/country%20report%20ukraine.pdf.

[8] Eurostat. (2025). Labour costs survey – NACE Rev. 2 activity (lcs_r2). Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/metadata/en/lcs_r2_esqrs_de.htm.

[9] Fakas, I.V. (2022). Legal status of the mediator and mediation in civil proceedings. Law and Society, 4, 107-111. doi: 10.32842/2078-3736/2022.4.16.

[10] Federal Statistical Office (Destatis). (2024). Quarterly national accounts inventory based on ESA 2010 methodology – edition 2024. Retrieved from https://www.destatis.de/EN/Themes/Economy/National-Accounts-Domestic-Product/Publications/Downloads-National-Accounts-Domestic-Product/esa-2010-methodology-quarterly-national-accounts-inventory.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2.

[11] Giacalone, M., & Salehi, S. (2022). An empirical study on mediation in civil and commercial disputes in Europe: The mediation service providersʼ perspective. Revista Ítalo-española De Derecho Procesal, 2, 11-54. doi: 10.37417/rivitsproc/802.

[12] Grajewska, K., & Grajewski, A. (2023). Mediation proceedings following the amendments made by the Act of 2 December 2021 amending the Act Civil Code, Act Code of Civil Procedure and certain other acts in the context of the provisions of Art. 8(1) of Directive 2008/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on certain aspects of mediation in civil and commercial matters. Kwartalnik Prawa Międzynarodowego, 2(2), 79-103. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0053.6681.

[13] Itrich-Drabarek, J., Jurgilewicz, M., Misiuk, A., & Zając, A. (2022). Mediation in the administrative and court-administrative proceedings. Studia Iuridica, 89, 111-124. doi: 10.31338/2544-3135.si.2022-89.6.

[14] Jehle, J.-M. (2023). Criminal justice in Germany: Facts and figures. (8th ed.). Berlin: Federal Ministry of Justice.

[15] Kalashnyk, D., Kalmykov, M., & Shlikhta, O. (2023). Institute of mediation in civil proceedings. Juridical Scientific and Electronic Journal, 4, 173-175. doi: 10.32782/2524-0374/2023-4/41.

[16] Krunn, I.J.T., & Rocha, A.A. (2022). The peaceful resolution of conflicts: Mediation as a resolution technique in civil proceedings and restorative justice as a resolution mechanism in criminal proceedings. Scientific Journal of Applied Social and Clinical Science, 2(25), 2-9. doi: 10.22533/at.ed.2162252201126.

[17] Mallalieu, R., & Campbell, C. (2023). Resolving the Costs of the Action by Mediation not Litigation. Amicus Curiae, 4(2), 427-441. doi: 10.14296/ac.v4i2.5590.

[18] Menninga E.J. (2023). Bias and balance in civil war mediation. Journal of Peace Research, 61(4), 627-642. doi: 10.1177/00223433231156959.

[19] Myrza, S., & Gorbanov, I. (2023). Mediation as a modern method of dispute resolution in civil proceedings. South Ukrainian Law Journal, 4, 48-52. doi: 10.32850/sulj.2023.4.9.

[20] National Association of Mediators of Ukraine. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://namu.com.ua/ua/.

[21] Navrotska, Y.V., & Vorobel, U.B. (2022). Mediation agreement vs settlement agreement in civil proceedings. Law and Society, 3, 65-73. doi: 10.32842/2078-3736/2022.3.11.

[22] Németh, V., & Szabó, C. (2021). The effect of community mediations in the practice through an analysis of two municipal case studies. Belügyi Szemle, 69(6), 73-88. doi: 10.38146/bsz.spec.2021.6.5.

[23] Pakhomova, A. (2022). Prospects for mediation in civil proceedings. Juridical Scientific and Electronic Journal, 4, 173-175. doi: 10.32782/2524-0374/2022-4/38.

[24] Parasiuk, V., Grabar, N., Zdrenyk, I., Оnyshko, O., & Fedina, N. (2025). Harmonisation of Ukrainian legislation with EU law in the field of alternative civil dispute resolution: Challenges and prospects. Social and Legal Studios, 8(1), 336-349. doi: 10.32518/sals1.2025.336.

[25] Sutiyoso, B. (2023). Implementation of mediation as Online Dispute resolution (ODR) in civil jurisdiction. International Journal of Environmental Sustainability and Social Science, 4(1), 297-308. doi: 10.38142/ijesss.v4i1.487.

[26] Takeya, N., & Yamada, Y. (2023). Online dispute resolution (ODR) and Japanese-Style mediation. Studia Iuridica Lublinensia, 32(4), 133-145. doi: 10.17951/sil.2023.32.4.133-145.

[27] Unified State Register of Court Decisions. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://reyestr.court.gov.ua.

[28] Zhushman, M., Ostrohliad, D., Cherniavska, D., & Tselykovska, O. (2021). Mediation in civil proceedings. Juridical Scientific and Electronic Journal, 12, 128-130. doi: 10.32782/2524-0374/2021-12/28.

[29] Zukh, Y., & Shveda, K. (2021). Mediation in civil proceedings during the COVID-19 pandemic. National Technical University of Ukraine Journal: Political Science, Sociology, Law, 4(48), 64-69. doi: 10.20535/2308-5053.2020.4(48).233238.