en

Scientific Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs

  • Received 30.01.2025,
  • Revised 03.05.2025,
  • Accepted 27.05.2025
Download article Download article
Vol. 30, No. 2, 2025
  • provocation; incitement; control over crime commission measures; covert investigative (search) actions; European Court of Human Rights; agent
  • https://doi.org/10.63341/naia-herald/2.2025.32
  • Pages 32-45

The issue of crime provocation is one of the key concerns in the field of criminal procedure and law enforcement practice, as it involves questions of human rights protection and the guarantee of a fair trial. The lack of clear criteria for distinguishing provocation from lawful actions by law enforcement agencies poses a risk to the admissibility of evidence obtained through covert investigative (search) actions. This study aimed to explore legal approaches to defining crime provocation, its implications for the admissibility of evidence in criminal proceedings, and the influence of the European Court of Human Rights case law on the practice of Ukrainian courts and national legislation. The study also sought to identify a balance between ensuring public safety and safeguarding the right to a fair trial. To achieve this aim, methods of comparative analysis, systems approach, legal-logical analysis, and interpretation of legal norms were applied, enabling a comprehensive examination of the issue of crime provocation. The research examined approaches to countering crime provocation in various countries, including the Republics of Lithuania and Latvia, Georgia, the Federal Republic of Germany, and the United States of America. The findings of the study demonstrated that crime provocation constitutes a serious violation of the right to a fair trial under Article 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. It also contradicts the principle of the rule of law, as it may result in unlawful judicial decisions. Relevant case law of the European Court of Human Rights concerning crime provocation has been examined, alongside the practice of national courts. Characteristics of incitement to commit a crime have been analysed. The study summarised the European Court of Human Rights approaches to distinguishing lawful law enforcement activities from provocation, as well as the case law of the Supreme Court on this issue. It has been established that the case law of the European Court of Human Rights plays a decisive role in shaping standards for assessing the legality of law enforcement conduct. However, its implementation in Ukraine remains insufficient. The practical value of this study lies in the development of recommendations for improving the legal regulation of control over crime commission measures, which will contribute to enhancing the effectiveness of criminal justice and the protection of human rights

References

[1] Abbasova, D.L. (2021). Provocation of criminal offence during the control over the commission of a crime: Ethical and legal aspects. Actual Problems of the State and Law, 90, 3-10. doi: 10.32837/apdp.v0i90.3200.

[2] Antonov, K.V., & Ivasyshyn, T.M. (2019). The practice of the European Court of Human Rights on recognizing evidence from crime control as admissible in court. Law and Society, 3, 197-202. doi: 10.32842/2078-3736-2019-3-1-33.

[3] Arkusha, L., & Torbas, O. (2021). Provocation and control over the commission of a crime: Significance and correlation. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 170, 141-145. doi: 10.2991/aebmr.k.211211.024.

[4] Babikov, O.P. (2024). Distinction between provocation of a crime and lawful activity of law enforcement agencies in the legislation and judicial practice of Ukraine and other countries. Scientific Notes of TNU Named After V.I. Vernadsky. Series: Legal Sciences, 35(2), 89-96. doi: 10.32782/TNU-2707-0581/2024.2/14.

[5] Bakaieva, O., Zmiivskyi, V., Yehorov, S., Stashchak, M., & Shendryk, V. (2021). International experience of citizen engagement in prevention of criminal offences. Cuestiones Políticas, 39(68), 708-722. doi: 10.46398/cuestpol.3968.45.

[6] Berdnik, I.V., & Tagiev, S.R. (2024). Provocation of a crime: Analysis of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights and the Supreme Court. Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence, 2, 108-115. doi: 10.24144/2788-6018.2024.02.108.

[7] Blikhar, V., Dufeniuk, O., & Blikhar, M. (2021). Balance of “goal-means” in the system of criminal procedure or can a good goal justify evil means? Beytulhikme an International Journal of Philosophy, 11(4), 1801-1817. doi: 10.18491/beytulhikme.1804.

[8] Bredun, S.O., & Kryvets, O.V. (2022). Problem of criminal liability for provoking a crime. Legal Scientific Electronic Journal, 10, 533-536. doi: 10.32782/2524-0374/2022-10/133.

[9] Burovenskyi, M.V., & Hutnyk, V.V. (2020). Legal assessment of “bribery provocation” as a type of “crime provocation” in the practice of the European Court of Human Rights. Journal of Legal Studies, 6, 18-27. doi: 10.18523/2617-2607.2020.6.18-27.

[10] Dudorov, O.O. (2020). Prospects for the legislative regulation of provocative behavior and its legal consequences. Bulletin of the Association of Criminal Law of Ukraine, 2(14), 14-33. doi: 10.32782/2524-0374-2020-14-02.

[11] Dudorov, O.O. (2022). Provocation of a crime and criminal law prospects. Legal Scientific Electronic Journal, 8, 418-422. doi: 10.32782/2524-0374/2022-8/95.

[12] Giorgidze, A. (2022). Some issues of the mens rea of the provocation of a crime in the criminal law of Georgia. International Scientific Journal “Internauka”. Series: “Juridical Sciences”, 11. doi: 10.25313/2520-2308-2022-11.

[13] Gladiy, E.V. (2021). Recognition of inadmissibility of evidence obtained in the course of monitoring the commission of an offence in criminal proceedings in the field of official activities. Law Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, 11(2), 38-44. doi: 10.33270/04212202.38.

[14] Görlitz, F., Hubert, J., Kucher, J., Scheffer, M., & Wieser, P. (2019). “Tatprovokation” – the legal issue of entrapment in Germany and possible solutions. German Law Journal, 20, 496-509. doi: 10.1017/glj.2019.33.

[15] Hloviuk, I. (2023). The practice of the UCC on provocation (incitement) in criminal proceedings under Art. 149 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. In R.M. Andrusyshyn (Ed.), State policy on combating trafficking in human beings and illegal migration: Ukraine and the world: Collection of abstracts of the international scientific and practical conference (pp. 66-71). Lviv: Lviv State University of Internal Affairs.

[16] Hribov, M.L., Venediktov, A.A., & Venediktova, Y.E. (2021). Control over the commission of corruption crimes related to bribery: Issues of legality. Forensic Herald, 2(36), 7-15. doi: 10.37025/1992-4437/2021-36-2-7.

[17] Hrytsiuk, I.V., & Huk, T.I. (2021). Incitement to commit a criminal offense and provocation of a crime: Ethical and legal aspects. Legal Scientific Electronic Journal, 9, 440-443. doi: 10.32782/2524-0374/2021-9/111.

[18] Hura, O. (2022). Incitement to a crime in the practice of the Supreme Court in white-collar crime cases. Public Law, 3(47), 32-41. doi: 10.32782/2306-9082/2022-47-5.

[19] Hura, O. (2023). Incitement to committing a crime in cases of illegal use of humanitarian aid (Art. 201-2 Criminal Code of Ukraine): Fiction or reality? Public Law, 2(50), 75-84. doi: 10.32782/2306-9082/2023-50-8.

[20] Kamenskyi, D.V. (2021). Provocation of a criminal offense: Comparative legal aspect. Bulletin of the Penitentiary Association of Ukraine, 4(18), 22-31. doi: 10.34015/2523-4552.2021.4.02.

[21] Kartavtsev, V.S., Tomchuk, I.O., & Prytula, S.A. (2020). Criminal legal analysis of provocation of bribery under the legislation of Ukraine and foreign countries. Law and Society, 4, 227-234. doi: 10.32842/2078-3736/2020.4.33.

[22] Khavroniuk, M.I. (2006). Criminal legislation of Ukraine and other continental European states: Comparative analysis and harmonisation problems. Kyiv: Yuriskonsult.

[23] Khyzhniak, Y., Chyzh, S., Kucherov, D., Tsybulskyi, D., & Shyshatska, Y. (2022). Problematic aspects of the conduct of covert investigative (search) actions by the authorized criminal police officers within the framework of criminal investigation. Amazonia Investiga, 11(60), 121-128. doi: 10.34069/AI/2022.60.12.12.

[24] Kret, H.R. (2021). Control over the commission of a crime: Normative consolidation and practice of implementation. Scientific Bulletin of the International Humanitarian University. Series: Jurisprudence, 51, 132-136. doi: 10.32841/2307-1745.2021.51.26.

[25] Marochkin, O.I. (2024). Consequences of provocation of a crime during covert investigative (search) actions to prove in the field of law enforcement: Judicial practice. Legal Scientific Electronic Journal, 7, 440-444. doi: 10.32782/2524-0374/2024-7/105.

[26] Novytskyi, H.V. (2020). Crime provocation and special investigative experiment: Delimitation problems. Bulletin of Criminal Justice, 3-4, 22-31. doi: 10.17721/2413-5372.2020.3-4/22-31.

[27] Pentney, K. (2021). Licensed to kill… discourse? Agents provocateurs and a purposive right to freedom of expression. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 39(3), 241-257. doi: 10.1177/09240519211033429.

[28] Pomaz, Ya. (2021). Admissibility of evidence obtained as a result of provocation during the pre-trial investigation of criminal offences related to the illegal sale of drugs. Scientific Bulletin of the International Humanitarian University. Series: Jurisprudence, 54(2), 123-135. doi: 10.32841/2307-1745.2021.54.2.27.

[29] Poplavska, А.М. (2024). Рeculiarities of secret investigative (search) actions in the legislation of Germany and Ukraine. Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence, 4, 653-658. doi: 10.24144/2788-6018.2024.04.108.

[30] Shcherbakovskyi, M., Stepaniuk, R., Kikinchuk, V., Oderiy, O., & Svyrydova, L. (2020). Evidentiary problems in the investigation of corruption crimes in Ukraine. Amazonia Investiga, 9(32), 117-124. doi: 10.34069/AI/2020.32.08.12.

[31] Shulhin, S.O. (2024). Legal consequences of the statement of provocation by the defense party: Scientific and practical aspects. Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence, 5, 128-142. doi: 10.24144/2788-6018.2024.05.128.

[32] Spytska, L. (2024). The impact of the European Court of Human Rights judgements on the development and transformation of Ukrainian law. Social and Legal Studios, 7(4), 9-17. doi: 10.32518/sals4.2024.09.

[33] Sybal, O.B. (2020). Control over the commission of a crime: Criminal law aspect. Legal Scientific Electronic Journal, 3, 337-341. doi: 10.32782/2524-0374/2020-3/81.

[34] U.S. Department of Justice. (n.d.). Criminal resource manual: 645. Entrapment – elements. Retrieved from https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-645-entrapment-elements.

[35] Veretyannikov, V.O. (2020). On the question of establishing signs of provocative action as a part of a crime proposed Art. 370 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University. Law Series, 62, 257-262.

[36] Veretyannikov, V.O. (2021). Crime provocation in German criminal law (comparative legal aspect). Bulletin of the Penitentiary Association of Ukraine, 1(15), 75-83. doi: 10.34015/2523-4552.2021.1.06.