Scientific Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs

  • Received 04.08.2024,
  • Revised 28.10.2024,
  • Accepted 26.11.2024
Download article Download article
Vol. 29, No. 4, 2024
  • military criminal offences; military official; military commander; military chief; military disci- pline; disciplinary authority; criminal liability
  • https://doi.org/10.56215/naia-herald/4.2024.61
  • Pages 61-74

The relevance of this study is conditioned by the increasing significance of legal mechanisms in ensuring law and order, discipline, and responsibility of military leadership under martial law and combat situation. The purpose of this study was to theoretically investigate the key aspects affecting the qualification and investigation of criminal offences under Article 426-1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine and to identify the problems and shortcomings related to the application of current legislation in proving the guilt of the perpetrator of such an offence. The methodological toolkit included a set of general scientific and special methods of legal analysis. The legal method was employed to analyse current legislation, the historical legal method – to investigate the evolution of legal provisions, the comparative legal method – to compare various approaches to the application of national legislation in practice, etc. This analysis was aimed at determining the place of the criminal offence under study in the system of forensic classification of military criminal offences. The study identified the elements determining the specifics of their investigation and providing them with a forensic characterisation to develop effective methods for investigating abuse of power or authority by military personnel. Based on the findings, the study provided a theoretical legal characterisation of the subject of the offence under study, which is a military officer. The study analysed such legal categories as special period, martial law, and combat situation. The specifics of abuse of power and official authority in the military sphere were identified. The study described the key aspects of military subordination and clarified the concepts of a military commander and a military superior. The study proposed to supplement the provisions of the Law of Ukraine “On Military Duty and Military Service” in the part relating to the category of “military official” to ensure harmonisation of legislative provisions governing legal relations in the military sphere with criminal law provisions prescribing liability for offences against the established procedure for military service

References

[1] Bayda, A., & Sklez, O. (2019). Main problems of qualification of crimes committed under martial law. A Young Scientist, 4(68), 112-116. doi: 10.32839/2304-5809/2019-4-68-26.

[2] Bondaevsky, V. (2012). “State of war”, “combat situation” and “time spent in military service” as special circumstances of the validity of criminal legislation regarding war crimes over time. Academic Notes of the Taurida National University Named After V.I. Vernadskyi: “Law Sciences” Series, 25(64), 180-186.

[3] Dmytrenko, N., & Shkuta, O. (2022). Crime in the Armed Forces of Ukraine: Criminological characteristics and prevention. Kherson: “Helvetyka” Publishing House.

[4] Dovlatov, Sh., Savchenko, A., & Salenko, A. (2023). Criminal liability for exceeding authority or official authority by a military official. Scientific Bulletin of the Uzhhorod National University, 2(76), 91-95. doi: 10.241444/2307-3322.76.2.15.

[5] Gizimchuk, S. (2021). Characterization of the content of certain signs of martial law as a circumstance aggravating responsibility for war crimes. The Issue of Fighting Crime, 41, 99-104. doi: 10.31359/2079-6242-2021-41-99.

[6] Gorinov, P., & Mereniuk, K. (2022). Military law in Ukraine: Future prospects for development. Futurity Economics & Law, 2(3), 18-27. doi: 10.57125/FEL.2022.09.25.03.

[7] Gurchenko, K. (2023). Concepts of martial law and combat situation as qualifying features of the crime of desertion: Significance for criminal responsibility. Dictum Factum: Law Collection DUIT, Series: Military Criminal Law, 2(14), 166-172. doi: 10.32703/2663-6352/2023-2-14-166-172.

[8] Kizyun, O. (2020). Legal analysis of the composition of the excess of power or official authority by a military person. Combating Crime: Problems of Practice and Scientific and Methodological Support, 3, 64-68. doi: 10.32850/sulj.2020.3.12.

[9] Komissarov, M., Komissarova, N., & Samedov, E. (2024). Qualification of military criminal offences committed by servicemen in complicity under martial law. Scientific Bulletin of the Kyiv Institute of the National Guard of Ukraine, 1, 74-79. doi: 10.59226/2786-6920.1.2024.74-79.

[10] Kovalenko, N. (2019). On the issue of defining the concept and features of the legal regime. Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law, 12, 254-258. doi: 10.32849/2663-5313/2019.12.47.

[11] Kovbasyuk, Yu., Troshchynskyi, V., & Surmin, Yu. (Eds.). (2010). Encyclopaedic dictionary of public administration. Kyiv: National Academy of Public Administration.

[12] Medvid, L. (2020). Peculiarities of the criminal liability of military personnel for committing military criminal offencesActual Problems of Criminal Law, 121-123.

[13] Melnyk, M., & Havronyuk, M. (Eds.). (2002). Scientific and practical commentary on the Criminal Code of Ukraine dated April 5, 2001. Kyiv: Kanon, A.S.K.

[14] Messervey, D., & Squires, E. (2021). Empirical research on military ethical behavior. In A.M. Sookermany (Ed.), Handbook of military sciences. Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-02866-4_58-1.

[15] Obodovsky, O. (2021). General characteristics of military criminal offences. Scientific Bulletin of the International Humanitarian University. Series: Jurisprudence, 51, 108-114. doi: 10.32841/2307-1745.2021.51.22.

[16] Podolyak, A., & Dyomin, Yu. (2021). Regarding the distinction between military administrative offences and criminal offences. The Right of the UA, 2, 47-54. doi: 10.32782/law.ua.2021.2.7.

[17] Review of judicial practice of the Criminal Court of Cassation as part of the Supreme Court (current practice) for July 2023. (2023). Retrieved from: https://supreme.court.gov.ua/userfiles/media/new_folder_for_uploads/supreme/sud_practice/Oglyad_KKS_07_2023.pdf.

[18] Rubanenko, N. (2024). Concept, typology and characteristics of international crimes: Systematic analysis. Law Forum, 79(2), 84-95. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10933562.

[19] Savchenko, A., & Kryshevych, O. (2012). Crimes in the sphere of official activity and professional activity related to the provision of professional services. Scientific and practical commentary on Chapter XVII of the Special Part of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. Kyiv: Alerta.

[20] Shkarpytska, V. (2018). Peculiarities of disciplinary responsibility of military personnelActual Problems of Domestic Jurisprudence, 6(2), 165-168.

[21] Sokurenko, V. (2015). Legal understanding of the concept of “military unit” as an element of the system of the Armed Forces of UkraineScientific Bulletin of the Lviv State University of Internal Affairs: Legal Series, 3, 178-185.

[22] Stefaniv, N. (2023) General characteristics of military criminal offences. National School of Judges of Ukraine. Retrieved from https://supreme.court.gov.ua/userfiles/media/new_folder_for_uploads/supreme/2023_prezent/Stefaniv_voenni_zlochini.pdf.

[23] Vakaryuk, L. (2016). Basic approaches to understanding the concept of “legal regime”Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law, 12, 196-201.

[24] Vartyletska, I., & Sharman, O. (2021). Peculiarities of the qualification of criminal offences committed under martial law and a special period. Bulletin of the Criminal Law Association of Ukraine, 1(15), 191-206. doi: 10.21564/2311-9640.2021.15.233611.

[25] Yakovlev, O. (2015). “Legal regime”: Approaches to the definition of the conceptLaw and Innovation, 2(10), 80-85.

[26] Yankovy, M. (2023). Investigation of criminal offences committed by military personnel during the armed conflict: Statement of the problem. Academic Visions, 18. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7795218.

[27] Yarmysh, N. (2015). On the relationship between the legal concepts of “official” and “official”: Proceedings of the conferences of the Department of Criminal Law and Process. Retrieved from https://er.nau.edu.ua/handle/NAU/14609?mode=full.

[28] Yatsenko, S., & Shakuna, V. (Eds.). (1998). Criminal Code of Ukraine: Scientific and practical commentary. Kyiv: Legal sources.

[29] Zvenigorodskyi, O., & Kizyun, O. (2022). The concept of exceeding authority or official authority by a military official in the conditions of martial law or in a combat situation. Actual Problems of Domestic Jurisprudence, 4, 156-161. doi: 10.32782/39221334.