en

Scientific Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs

  • Received 03.06.2024,
  • Revised 05.08.2024,
  • Accepted 27.08.2024
Download article Download article
Vol. 29, No. 3, 2024
  • memory studies; historical memory legislation; memory policy instruments; decentralisation; reforms
  • https://doi.org/10.56215/naia-herald/3.2024.79
  • Pages 79-94

Among several issues with Ukrainian collective memory of its Communist period, this study specifically addressed the one of lack of a coherent approach to the formation of such memory. The purpose of this study was to identify whether the “decommunisation laws”, adopted in 2015, provided Ukrainian memory entrepreneurs with sufficiently robust tools to build a politics of memory that would be equally applicable across the country. To this end, this study adopted the process tracing method, highlighting the case study of the drafting and adoption of the “decommunisation laws” by relevant stakeholders and the Ukrainian Parliament. Having investigated the preparatory works of these laws and their adoption, it was found that the question of centralisation played a significant role in the establishment of a coherent collective memory of Communism in Ukraine. More specifically, the fact that Members of Parliament pursued a decentralisation-driven agenda resulted in an impediment to the creation of a robust approach to Ukrainian memory of communism. It was also found that the decommunisation package granted Ukrainian memory policymakers several tools to shape the population’s memory of Communism, such as the renaming of toponyms related to Communism, opening access to the archives of the Communist regime, demolition of monuments praising Communist “heroes”, and institutionalisation of a Remembrance Day for victims of totalitarian regimes. Despite these findings, this study concluded that Ukrainian the “decommunisation laws” require a reform to achieve harmonisation considering the country’s aspirations for European integration. The findings of this study can serve as a basis for further recommendatory research on the matter of coherence in Ukrainian memory politics. Researchers might apply these findings to other events with domestically problematic memories or use them to suggest potential reforms to align Ukrainian collective memory of Communism with those of its European partners

References

[1] Beach, D. (2023). Process tracing methods and international studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.724.

[2] Bennett, A. (2010). Process tracing and causal inference. In H. Brady & D. Collier (Eds.), Rethinking social inquiry (pp. 207-221). Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield.

[3] Budrytė, D. (2023). A decolonising moment of sortsʼ: The Baltic statesʼ vicarious identification with Ukraine and related domestic and foreign policy developments. Central European Journal of International and Security Studies, 17(4), 82-105. doi: 10.51870/YPIJ8030.

[4] Bychkov Green, S. (1997). Language of lullabies: The Russification and de-russification of the Baltic states. Michigan Journal of International Law, 19(219), 220-274. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1261425.

[5] Coulson, J. (2021). The Holodomor in collective memory: Constructing Ukraine as a post-genocidenation. The General Assembly Review, 2(1). doi: 10.5206/tgar.v2i1.10421.

[6] Czarnota, A. (2009). Lustration, decommunisation and the rule of law. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 1(2), 307-336. doi: 10.1017/S1876404509003078.

[7] DʼAnieri, P. (2022). Ukraine’s 2019 elections: Pro-Russian parties and the impact of occupation. Europe- Asia Studies, 74(10), 1915-1936. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2022.2117793.

[8] Demska, O., & Levchuk, P. (2020). The Urbanonimia of Ukraine in the context of decommunisation. Cognitive Studies, 20, article number 2280. doi: 10.11649/cs.2280.

[9] Dovhopolova, O. (2019). “Disruptions” of collective memory: Issues of understanding and curing. Modern Ukraine, 26(1), 141-161. doi: 10.3138/ukrainamoderna.26.141.

[10] Farewell, unwashed Russia – Poroshenko after the visa-free regime entered into force. (2017). Retrieved from https://www.radiosvoboda.org/a/video/28540958.html.

[11] Fedinec, C., & Csernicskó, I. (2017). (Re)conceptualisation of memory in Ukraine after the Revolution of Dignity. Central European Papers, 5(1), 46-71. doi: 10.25142/cep.2017.003.

[12] Fontaine, G. (2020). Process tracing for comparative policy analysis: A realist approach. In G. Peters & G. Fontaine (Eds.), Handbook of research methods and applications in comparative policy analysis (pp. 277-295). London: Edward Elgar Publishing. doi: 10.4337/9781788111195.00024.

[13] Gnatiuk, O., Pisotska, K., Polhun, V., & Zapototska, V. (2023). Public inertia towards the new toponymic landscapes in Vinnytsia, Ukraine. Journal of the Bulgarian Geographical Society, 49, 53-68. doi: 10.3897/ jbgs.e113331.

[14] Hentschel, G., & Palinska, O. (2022). The linguistic situation on the Ukrainian Black Sea coast-Ukrainian, Russian and suržyk as “native language”, “primary code”, frequently used codes and codes of linguistic socialisation during childhood. Russian Linguistics, 46(3), 259-290. doi: 10.1007/s11185-022-09259-4.

[15] Hunt, N. (2010). Memory, war and trauma. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[16] Kasianov, G. (2022). Challenges of antagonistic memory: Scholars versus politics and war. Memory Studies, 15(6), 1295-1298. doi: 10.1177/17506980221133517.

[17] Kasianov, G. (2023). In search of lost time? Decommunisation in Ukraine, 2014-2020. Problems of Post- Communism, 70. doi: 10.1080/10758216.2023.2198135.

[18] Koposov, N. (2020). Historians, memory laws, and the politics of the past. European Papers, 5(1), 107-117. doi: 10.15166/2499-8249/390.

[19] Kovalov, M. (2022). When Lenin becomes Lennon: Decommunisation and the politics of memory in Ukraine. Europe-Asia Studies, 74(5), 709-733. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2022.2078478.

[20] Kuczabski, A., & Boychuk, A. (2020). Decommunisation of urban toponymy in Ukraine: Causes and consequences. Journal of Geography, Politics and Society, 10(4), 8-16. doi: 10.26881/jpgs.2020.4.02.

[21] Kudriavtseva, N. (2020). Reconfiguring identities within the cityscape: Ideologies of decommunisation renaming in Ukraine. Ideology and Politics Journal, 15(1), 63-82. doi: 10.36169/2227-6068.2020.01.00004.

[22] Kulyk, V. (2018). Shedding Russianness, recasting Ukrainianness: The post-Euromaidan dynamics of ethnonational identifications in Ukraine. Post-Soviet Affairs, 34(2-3), 119-138. doi: 10.1080/1060586X.2018.1451232.

[23] Kutsenko, D. (2020). Experience of implementing decommunisation laws in Eastern Ukraine: A Kharkiv case. Journal of Geography, Politics and Society, 10(3), 55-64. doi: 10.1080/1060586X.2018.1451232.

[24] Langenbacher, E., & Shain, Y. (2010). Power and the past: Collective memory and international relations. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.

[25] Lavrov: How is it possible to speak of a unitary state in Ukraine? (2015). Retrieved from https://gordonua.com/news/politics/Lavrov-Kak-mozhno-dazhe-zaikatsya-ob-unitarnosti-Ukrainy-76869.html.

[26] Lebow, R.N. (2006). The memory of politics in postwar Europe. In R.N. Lebow, W. Kansteiner & C. Fogu (Eds.), The politics of memory in postwar Europe (pp. 1-39). Durham: Duke University Press.

[27] Liubarets, A. (2016). The politics of memory in Ukraine in 2014 removal of the Soviet cultural legacy and Euromaidan commemorations. Kyiv-Mohyla Humanities Journal, 3(1), 198-214. doi: 10.18523/ kmhj73968.2016-3.197-214.

[28] Lytovchenko, A., Boiko, D., Yashkina, D., & Holm-Hansen, J. (2021). Discourse of moderation and cohesion as an effective electoral tool: Sluha Narodu in Ukraine’s 2019 parliamentary campaign. Ideology and Politics Journal, 1(1), 111-141.

[29] Marples, D.R. (2018). Decommunisation, memory laws, and “builders of Ukraine in the 20th century. Acta Slavica Iaponica, 39. doi: 10.14943/ASI.39.1.

[30] Maslo, K. (2023). When is genocide a crime of genocide? The Holodomor and the Katyn Massacre as a crime of genocide. Special Issue Review of European and Comparative Law, Special Issue, 31-53. doi: 10.31743/recl.16523.

[31] Neumayer, L. (2015). Integrating the Central European past into a common narrative: The mobilisations around the “crimes of communism” in the European Parliament. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 23(3), 344-363. doi: 10.1080/14782804.2014.1001825.

[32] Nimchenko, V., & Shpenov, D. (2017). The constitutional complaint as to the Ukrainian Constitution (constitutionality) of Law of Ukraine No. 317-VIII.

[33] Nominal voting for the bill Law No. 2538-1 “On Condemning the Communist and National Socialist (Nazi) Totalitarian Regimes and Prohibiting the Propagation of their Symbols,” April 9, 2015. (2015). Retrieved from http://w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/radan_gs09/ns_arh_golos?g_id=142708&n_skl=8.

[34] Press service of the Prosecutorʼs Office of Lviv region. (2017). A young man who promoted communist ideology was convicted. Retrieved from https://lviv.gp.gov.ua/ua/news.html?_m=publications&_ c=view&_t=rec&id=207411.

[35] Romanova, V., & Umland, A. (2019). Decentralisation reform in Ukraine in 2014-2019: First achievements and future challenges. Ideology and Politics, 14(3), 148-170.

[36] Rozenas, A., & Vlasenko, A. (2022). The real consequences of symbolic politics: Breaking the Soviet past in Ukraine. The Journal of Politics, 84(3), 1263-1277. doi: 10.1086/718210.

[37] Saryusz-Wolska, M., Wawrzyniak, J., & Wóycicka, Z. (2022). Russian war of aggression in Ukraine: Challenges for memory studies. Memory Studies, 15(6), 1289-1290. doi: 10.1177/17506980221134908.

[38] Sazhniev, M., & Sułkowska, J. (2020). Russian culture and management of meaning in introduction of political influence in Ukraine. Journal of International Studies, 1(13), 310-323. doi: 10.14254/2071- 8330.2020/13-1/20.

[39] Shaikan, A., & Shaikan, V. (2022). Delinquent and “marginal” personalities in wartime: Reasons and Consequences of deviant behaviour for modern society. In Proceedings of the 5th international scientific congress Society of Ambient Intelligence (ISC SAI 2022) – sustainable development and global climate change (pp. 327-334). Praha: Oktan Print. doi: 10.5220/0011356900003350.

[40] Shestopalets, D. (2020). Church and state in Ukraine after the Euromaidan: President Poroshenkoʼs discourse on religion, 2014-2018. Politics and Religion, 13(1), 150-179. doi: 10.1017/S1755048319000221.

[41] Shevel, O. (2016). The battle for historical memory in post-revolutionary Ukraine. Current History, 115(783), 258-263. doi: 10.1525/curh.2016.115.783.258.

[42] Siddi, M. (2017). The Ukraine crisis and European memory politics of the Second World War. European Politics and Society, 18(4), 465-479. doi: 10.1080/23745118.2016.1261435.

[43] Transcript of the Plenary Session of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine No. 25. (2015, April). Retrieved from https://www.rada.gov.ua/meeting/stenogr/show/5842.html.

[44] Transcript of the Plenary Session of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine No. 28. (2015, April). Retrieved from https://www.rada.gov.ua/meeting/stenogr/show/5849.html.

[45] UINM. (2014). How to rename a street – a methodological collection. Kyiv-Chernyhiv: Ukrainian Institute of National Memory.

[46] Volodymyr Viatrovych, director of UINM: I will not tolerate compromises in the issues of the national memory. (2019). Retrieved from https://rozmova.wordpress.com/2019/06/17/volodymyr- Viatrovych-53/.

[47] Vus, O. (2017). Viatrovych commented his ban from entering Poland. Retrieved from: https://politics.segodnya.ua/ua/politics/Viatrovych-prokommentiroval-zapret-vezda-v-polshu- 1070940.html.

[48] Wylegała, A. (2017). Managing the difficult past: Ukrainian collective memory and public debates on history. Nationalities Papers, 45(5), 780-797. doi: 10.1080/00905992.2016.1273338.

[49] Zheltovskyy, V. (2020). European integration processes in post-Euromaidan Ukraine: In search for scenarios. Online Journal Modelling the New Europe, 32, 72-92. doi: 10.24193/OJMNE.2020.32.05.