Scientific Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs

  • Received 25.05.2024,
  • Revised 30.07.2024,
  • Accepted 27.08.2024
Download article Download article
Vol. 29, No. 3, 2024
  • European Union law; Court of Justice; judgements of the Court of Justice; interpretation of European Union law; judicial practice
  • https://doi.org/10.56215/naia-herald/3.2024.27
  • Pages 27-41

The judgements of the Court of Justice of the European Union play a fundamental role in shaping the EU acquis. The relevance of this study lies in their impact not only on the law enforcement practice within the Union, but also on the trends in the development and amendment of the EU regulations. Considering the above, the purpose of this study was to determine the role of judgements of the Court of Justice of the European Union in shaping the law of the European Union and the legal systems of the candidate states. The methodological framework of this study was based on general scientific and special research methods, such as analysis and synthesis, induction, interpretation, formal logical, and comparative legal methods. The study established the existence of a link between the structural and functional evolution of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the increasing weight of its judgements; the study identified the channels of influence of its judgements on the establishment and development of European Union law. The study outlined the current challenges faced by the judges of the Court of Justice of the European Union and which affect the efficiency of its work. Based on the analysis of the judicial practice of Ukraine and Moldova regarding the use of judgements of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the study substantiated the general significance of judicial precedent in the context of European integration of the candidate states, as well as potential problems of their widespread use in the judicial practice of these states. The practical significance of the findings obtained is that they can be used in educational programmes for training specialists in the field of European law, to develop strategies and policies aimed at integrating candidate states into the EU, ensuring their compliance with the legal standards of the Union

References

[1] Adam, C., Bauer, M.W., Hartlapp, M., & Mathieu, E. (2020). Taking the EU to Court: Annulment proceedings and multilevel judicial conflict. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-21629-0.

[2] Boin, A., & Schmidt, S.K. (2020). The European Court of Justice: Guardian of European integration. In A. Boin, A.L. Fahy & P. Hart (Eds.), Guardians of public value (pp. 135-159). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-51701-4_6.

[3] Casolari, F. & Gatti, M. (Eds.). (2022) The application of EU law beyond its borders. Hague: T.M.C. Asser Institute.

[4] Court of Justice of European Union. (2024a). Annual report 2023 statistics concerning the judicial activity of the Court of JusticeLuxemburg: Court of Justice.

[5] Court of Justice of European Union. (2024b). Selection of major judgments year 2023. Collection оf résumés by the research and documentation directorateLuxemburg: Court of Justice.

[6] Court of Justice of European Union. (2024c). Press release CJEU No 99/24. Retrieved from https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2024-06/cp240099en.pdf.

[7] Cremona, M., & Scott, J. (2019). EU law beyond EU borders: The extraterritorial reach of EU law. In Oxford, XXVII/1 collected courses of the Academy of European Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[8] Eliantonio, M. (2010). Europeanisation of administrative justice? The influence of the ECJ’s case law in Italy, Germany and EnglandEuropean Review of Public Law, 22(3), 683-737.

[9] Fjelstul, J.C., Gabel, M., & Carrubba, C.J. (2022). The timely administration of justice: Using computational simulations to evaluate institutional reforms at the CJEU. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(12), 2643-2664. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2022.2113115.

[10] Ghavanini, A.W. (2023). The EU Court of Justice as a relational actor: An introduction. European Law Open, 2(2), 233-243. doi: 10.1017/elo.2023.40.

[11] Gierczyk, Y.N. (2005). The evolution of the European legal system: The European Court of Justice’s role in the harmonization of lawsILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law, 12(1), article number 6.

[12] Koen, L. (2020). New horizons for the rule of law within the EU. German Law Journal Volume, 21(1), 29-34. doi: 10.1017/glj.2019.91.

[13] Komanovics, A. (2022). Hungary and the Luxembourg court: The CJEUʼs role in the rule of law battlefield. EU and Comparative Law Issues and Challenges Series (ECLIC), 6, 122-157. doi: 10.25234/eclic/22413.

[14] Komarova, Т.V. (2018). Court of Justice of the European Union: Development of the judicial system and practice of interpretation of EU law. Kharkiv: Law.

[15] Lomaka, V., Yakoviyk, I., & Bilousov, Ye. (2023). Europeanisation and its impact on candidate countries for EU membership: A view from Ukraine. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 2, 59-81. doi: 10.33327/ AJEE-18-6.2-a000221.

[16] Mańko, R. (2023). ECJ case law on judicial independence: A chronological overview. Briefing of European Parliament. Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2023/753955/ EPRS_BRI(2023)753955_EN.pdf.

[17] Mayoral, J.A., & Wind, M. (2022). Unleashed dialogue or captured by politics? The impact of judicial independence on national higher courtsʼ cooperation with the CJEU. Journal of European Public Policy, 29(9), 1433-1453. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2021.1974925.

[18] Ovádek, M. (2023) The making of landmark rulings in the European Union: The case of national judicial independence. Journal of European Public Policy Volume, 30(6), 1119-1141 doi: 10.1080/13501763.2022.2066156.

[19] Pavone, T., & Kelemen, R. (2019). The evolving judicial politics of European integration: The European Court of Justice and national courts revisited. European Law Journal, 25(4), 352-373. doi: 10.1111/ eulj.12321.

[20] Petrov, R., & Kalinichenko, P. (2011) The europeanization of third country judiciaries through the application of the EU acquis: The cases of Russia and UkraineThe International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 60(2), 32-353.

[21] Reich, A., & Micklitz H.-W. (Eds.). (2020). The impact of the European Court of Justice on neighbouring countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780198855934.001.0001.

[22] Smyrnova, K. (2014) Extraterritorial effect of the EU law: Experience for UkraineLegal Journal “Law of Ukraine”, 4, 153-159.

[23] Smyrnova, K. (2020). Europeanisation of Ukraine’s legal order: Legal framework and trends in law enforcement. Retrieved from http://surl.li/cnjzcw.

[24] Toncoglaz, M. (2021). The current role of the ECJ in the European Union’s legal system of the European Union. Vector European, 1, 52-57. doi: 10.52507/2345-1106.2021-1.10.

[25] von Danwitz, T. (2024). Current challenges for the rule of law and the role of the judiciary in Europe. Fascicolo, 1, 148-151. doi: 10.13130/2723-9195/2024-1-11.