ISSN 2410-3594
e-ISSN 2786-7382
UDC 34; 159.9
Scientific Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs
- personal search; search of a person’s home or other property; right to respect for private and family life; collection of evidence; criminal proceedings; criminal offence
- https://doi.org/10.56215/naia-herald/2.2024.57
- Pages 57-66
The European Court of Human Rights has long been issuing judgments in which it has argued that human rights and freedoms are violated by the authorised state bodies in their professional activities, specifically in such a complex investigative (search) action as a search, which demonstrates the relevance of investigating the issues of applying the practice of this court by investigators during a search. The purpose of this study was to determine the basis for the investigator to apply the practices of the European Court of Human Rights during a search and to formulate relevant recommendations for investigative practice. To fulfil this purpose, the following scientific methods were employed: philosophical (dialectical), general scientific (analysis, induction, deduction, comparative legal, analogy, formal legal), and special forensic (forensic versioning, forensic planning, criminal analysis of the situation) methods. The study found that the application of the practices of the European Court of Human Rights by an investigator during the col- lection of evidence, specifically during a search, is regulated by the national legislation of Ukraine. It was emphasised that the investigator is authorised to apply the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, delivered both against Ukraine and other states, during the search. Based on the analysis of several judgments of the European Court of Human Rights concerning Ukraine and Bulgaria, the study found that they reflect not only the criminal procedural aspects of search (compliance of the criminal procedure leg- islation of Ukraine and Bulgaria with the provisions of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and its protocols; clear requirements for conducting procedural actions), but also the forensic aspects (contain an indication of the optimised tactical behaviour of investigators in cer- tain situations; prescribe the mechanism, method of detection, recording and seizure (obtaining) of forensi- cally relevant information). The study identified the stages of a search and the specific features of applying the practices of the European Court of Human Rights within their framework. Based on the findings of the study, certain forensic recommendations for investigators during a search were developed based on the practices of the European Court of Human Rights. The findings of the study will be useful for improving the relevant provisions of the criminal procedure legislation of Ukraine and investigative practice
References
[1] Basysta, I.V. (2021). Regarding the legality of conducting a search and/or inspection of a personʼs home or other property on behalf of an investigator, inquirer, or prosecutor. Social and Legal Studios, 3(13), 115-122. doi: 10.32518/2617-4162-2021-3-115-122.
[2] Bernardini, L., & Sanvitale, F. (2023). Searches and seizures of electronic devices in European criminal proceedings: A new pattern for independent review? Revista Italo-espanola De Derecho Procesal, 1, 73- 119. doi: 10.37417/rivitsproc/1475.
[3] Blahuta, R.I., & Priakhin, Ye.V. (Eds.). (2013). Investigative (search) actions. Lviv: LvDUVS.
[4] Chornous, Y., & Hvozdiuk, V. (2021). Methodological principles of conducting investigative (search) actions taking into account the practice of the European Court Human Rights. Philosophical and Methodological Problems of Law, 22(2), 38-47. doi: 10.33270/02212202.38.
[5] Donald, A., & Speck, A.-K. (2019). The European Court of Human Rightsʼ remedial practice and its impact on the execution of judgments. Human Rights Law Review, 19(1), 83-117. doi: 10.1093/hrlr/ ngy043.
[6] Drozdov, O.M., & Drozdova, O.V. (2022). Current issues of criminal action procedural law in time (examples extension of pre-court investigation terms). Law and Public Administration, 2, 261-270. doi: 10.32840/pdu.2022.2.37.
[7] ECHR. (2022). Annual report 2021. Brussel: Council of Europe.
[8] ECHR. (2023). Annual report 2022. Brussel: Council of Europe.
[9] ECHR. (2024). Annual report 2023. Brussel: Council of Europe.
[10] Eskens, S., van Daalen, O.L., & Van Eijk, N. (2016). Secret surveillance and detection: Guidelines for legislative design (legal standards for secret surveillance in the context of criminal investigation). Papers. SSRN. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3023846.
[11] Galagan, V.I., Ablamskyi, S.Y., Udovenko, Z.V., & Ablamska, V.V. (2021). Judicial control as a guarantee of non-interference in private life during the investigation: An observation within the framework of the European Court of Human Rights. DIXI, 23(2). doi: 10.16925/2357-5891.2021.02.12.
[12] Gorbanov, I., Marchenko, O., Lisnichenko, D., Piaskovskyi, V., & Matiiek, L. (2022). Procedural and organizational and tactical features of the search: Procedural and organisational characteristics and search tactics. Cuestiones Políticas, 40(73), 403-416. doi: 10.46398/cuestpol.4073.21.
[13] Goss, R. (2023) The Disappearing Minimum Rightsʼ of Article 6 ECHR: the Unfortunate Legacy of Ibrahim and Beuze. Human Rights Law Review, 23(4), 1-23. doi: 10.1093/hrlr/ngad024.
[14] Hloviuk, I.V., Hryniuk, V.O., & Kovalchuk, S.O. (2020). Application of compulsory hospitalisation of mentally disordered people in criminal proceedings of Ukraine in the context of European court of human rights case law. Comparative-analytical Law, 524-528. doi: 10.32782/2524-0390/2020.1.131.
[15] Hvozdyuk, V.V. (2021a). Tactics of conducting investigative (search) actions taking into account the practice of the European Court of Human Rights. (Doctoral dissertation, National Academy of Internal Affairs, Kyiv, Ukraine).
[16] Hvozdyuk, V.V. (2021b). Tactics of conducting investigative (search) actions taking in consideration the case law of the European court of human rights. Scientific Journal of Public and Private Law, 4, 206-211. doi: 10.32844/2618-1258.2021.4.36.
[17] Kremens, K. (2020). The authority competent to order searches and seizures in a comparative perspective: The need for judicial control. Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure Law, 6(3), 1585-1626. doi: 10.22197/rbdpp.v6i3.412.
[18] Mihashko, V. (2019). Influence of the European Court of Human Rights practice for development of judicial practice in Ukraine. Young Scientist, 2(66), 184-188. doi: 10.32839/2304-5809/2019-2-66-41.
[19] Nechval, A. (2019). Stages of searching: Theory and practice. Enterprise, Economy and Law, 6, 322-325. doi: 10.32849/2663-5313/2019.6.61.
[20] Pchelina, O.V. (2020). Application of practice European Court of Human Rights in domestic criminal proceedings. Southern Ukrainian Law Journal, 1, 160-164. doi: 10.32850/sulj.2020.1.33.
[21] Pyaskovskyi, V.V. (Ed.). (2020). Forensics. Kyiv: Law.
[22] Topping, J., & Bradford, B. (2020). Now you see it, now you donʼt: On the (in) visibility of police stop and search in Northern Ireland. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 20(1), 93-110. doi: 10.1177/1748895818800742.
[23] Weisser, B. (2019). The European Convention on Human Rights and the European Court of Human Rights as guardians of fair criminal proceedings in Europe. In K. Darryl, J. Brown, I. Turner & B. Weisser (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of criminal process (pp. 89-114). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190659837.013.6.
[24] Wickramasinghe, S. (2016). The use of hacking as a cybercrime investigation technique in Sri Lanka through the perspectives of the right to privacy as enumerated in Article 17 of International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, article 8 of European Convention on Human Rights and fourth amendment to the US Constitution. Papers.SSRN. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3175283.
[25] Zavhorodniy, V. (2016). The influence of the practice of the European Court of Human Rights on the legislation of Ukraine. National Law Journal: Teory and Practice, 6(1), 8-12.