ISSN 2410-3594
e-ISSN 2786-7382
UDC 34; 159.9
Scientific Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs
- active role of judges; speedy trial; access to justice; dismissal procedure; court
- https://doi.org/10.56215/naia-herald/1.2024.75
- Pages 75-88
A significant issue in the Indonesian legal system is the accessibility to justice in civil proceedings. This problem primarily arises from the rigid and time-consuming formal requirements, which hinder many individuals from effectively resolving their cases. Failure to meet these formal prerequisites often leads to case dismissals, ultimately impeding the application of the principle of a fast court process. This study aims to explore the extent of judgeʼs authority in assessing these formal requirements during the preliminary review in Indonesia. It adopts a normative juridical research approach, focusing on legislative and conceptual aspects. Primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources are analysed using various interpretation techniques, including grammatical and systematic interpretations. The findings reveal two contrasting viewpoints: the principle of a passive judge, which views judges as mere court observers without active involvement, and the emerging perspective emphasizing the role of an active judge. The concept of an active judge allows judges to advise plaintiffs on improving their claims if they fail to meet formal requirements, preventing the dismissal of their cases. In administrative and constitutional court proceedings, some mechanisms exist for reviewing and completing claims during the preliminary phase. However, it is essential to note that judges in civil proceedings lack a specific legal basis for providing guidance and recommendations to plaintiffs, and such actions are considered optional rather than obligatory. This lack of concrete implementation of the principles of expediency and access to justice in civil proceedings results in a backlog of cases and numerous cases being dismissed. The results of the study can be used in further regulatory adjustments regarding judgeʼs authority norm for ensuring preliminary review conduct
References
[1] Afriana, A. (2022). Basic principles of passive and active judge in civil court. Journal of Bina Mulia Law, 7(1), 142-154. doi: 10.23920/Jbmh.V7i1.1078.
[2] Fahren, O. (2020). The application of the principle of simple proof in bankruptcy cases in commercial courts (a special characteristic in the civil procedural law system). (PhD thesis, University of North Sumatra, Medan, Indonesia).
[3] Fikriyah, U. (2019). The active role of judges in examining witness testimonies in trials: Towards professional judges in the era of information technology advancement. Al-Adalah, 22(2), article number 145. doi: 10.35719/Aladalah.V22i2.19.
[4] Hidayat, D. (2023). Implementation and obstacles in civil dispute resolution. Indonesian Legal Development Journal, 5(1), 47-69. doi: 10.14710/jphi.v5i1.47-69.
[5] Makalew, J.M., Korah, R., & Gerungan, C.A. (2023). Juridical analysis of the Niet ontvankelijke verklaard (no) lawsuit in land disputes in civil procedure law. Lex Administratum, 11(2).
[6] Many, N., & Sofian, A. (2021). Free legal assistance (pro bono) as realization of access to justice for the poor in Indonesia. Media Information of Social Welfare Research, 44(3), 269-278.
[7] Marzuki, P.M. (2019). Legal research: Revised edition. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
[8] Merta, M.M., & Junaidi, J. (2020). Passive judge principles in Reglement Op De Rechtsvordering (R.V) and active judge principles in Herziene Indonesisch Reglement (HIR) in the Resolution of civil cases in court. Journal of Legal Science, 13(1), 60-77. doi: 10.31942/jqi.v13i1.3426.
[9] Prasetya, U. (2020). Analysis of the Audi et alteram partem principle in civil case trial process (Case No. 20/Pdt.G/2019/PN Pwr). Amnesty: Law Journal, 2(2), 57-75. doi: 10.37729/amnesti.v2i2.657.
[10] Pratiwi, E. (2022). Jeremy Benthamʼs utilitarianism theory: Purpose of law or legal product testing method? Constitutional Journal, 19(2), 268-293. doi: 10.31078/jk1922.
[11] Putra, I.G.A.K.B.W.A., Widiati, I.A.P., & Ujianti, N.M.P. (2020). Non-receivable lawsuit (Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard) in plaintiff divorce lawsuits in badung religious court. Legal Construction Journal, 1(2), 305-309. doi: 10.22225/jkh.2.1.2565.305-309.
[12] Putra, R.H.M.H. (2023). Analysis of the basis of judgesʼ consideration and legal consequences in rejecting divorce lawsuits that cannot be accepted (Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard) in court from the perspective of civil procedure law. Unes Law Review, 6(2), 4843-4856. doi: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1298.
[13] Rahman, F., & Wicaksono, D.A. (2016). Existence and characteristics of conditional decisions of the constitutional court. Constitutional Journal, 13(2), 348-378. doi: 10.31078/jk1326.
[14] Ramadhan, F., & Dwi Rafiqi, I. (2021). Study of constitutional court decisions cancelling all norms in the law. Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 29(2), 286-308. doi: 10.22219/ljih.v29i2.15434.
[15] Rijanto, B. (2019). Module entitled history, sources, and principles of civil procedure law. Tangerang Selatan: Universitas Terbuka.
[16] Sarmah, M., & Bohra, S. (2023). Right to speedy trial: Access to justice. Law Journal, 11(6), 965-983.
[17] Septiansyah, Z.B., & Ghalib, M. (2018). Utilitarianism concept in legal philosophy and its implementation in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Law and Social Institutions, 34(1), 27-34.
[18] Sitorus, S. (2018). Legal efforts in civil cases (objection, appeal, cassation, judicial review and third- party objection). Hikmah Journal, 15(1), 63-71.
[19] Suadi, H.A., & Hum, S.M. (2021). Renewal of civil procedure law in Indonesia. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
[20] Sultan, S. (2013). The value of justice in the principle of formal truth in civil cases: A perspective from islamic legal philosophy. (Doctoral dissertation, Islamic University of Alauddin Makassar, Makassar, Indonesia).
[21] Sunarto, S. (2016). Principle of active judge in civil cases. Law and Justice Journal, 5(2), 249-276. doi: 10.25216/jhp.5.2.2016.249-276.
[22] Toqsanbaeva, A.M.Q. (2023). The active role of the judge in the civil procedure in the context of the modern legislation. Science and Innovation, 1(8), 467-473. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7443296.
[23] Weda, N.K.D.N.I., Arjaya, I.M., & Seputra, I.P.G. (2021). Application of the active judge principle (dominus litis) in hearings at the state administrative court (Case study Decision No.1/G/2017/PTUN. DPS.). Journal of Legal Preferences, 2(1), 27-32. doi: 10.22225/jph.2.1.3048.27-32.