ISSN 2410-3594
e-ISSN 2786-7382
UDC 34; 159.9
Scientific Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs
- digital criminalistics; information sources; digitalisation; criminal offence; war crimes; martial law
- https://doi.org/10.56215/naia-herald/3.2023.48
- Pages 48-57
The electronic evidence has become one of the key components of criminal investigations. The use of digital evidence allows investigating not only criminal offences against the property, environment, etc., but also offences committed during the war and invasion. Since the beginning of the large-scale invasion of Ukraine, the number of pillage cases, which became known from open sources of information, has increased. The purpose of this study was to investigate the problematic issues of using digital evidence in the pillage investigation. The methodological basis was general scientific methods of cognition, namely, scientific abstraction, deduction and induction, extrapolation, and logical generalisation. The paper examines pillage among other war crimes in the context of determining the concept, composition of a crime, and the admissibility of digital evidence during the pillage investigation of this crime. The urgency of solving problematic aspects related to the pillage investigation, primarily in the context of a full-scale war in Ukraine, is substantiated. The pillage is separated from other crimes against property committed under martial law or a state of emergency. The problems of terminology are considered and approaches to the qualification of criminal offences committed under martial law, including shortcomings in law-making, are outlined. It is proposed to amend the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, defining the requirements for electronic evidence during the investigation of pillage. The practical significance of the study lies in the fact that such tools can be used for further research on the use of the digital evidence as a means of proof in the pillage investigation, as part of the development and improvement of legislation in this area
References
[1] About registered criminal offenses and the results of their pre-trial investigation. (2022). Retrieved from https://gp.gov.ua/ua/posts/pro-zareyestrovani-kriminalni-pravoporushennya-ta-rezultati-yih- dosudovogo-rozsliduvannya-2.
[2] Abraha, H.H. (2021). Law enforcement access to electronic evidence across borders: Mapping policy approaches and emerging reform initiatives. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 29(2), 118-153. doi: 10.1093/ijlit/eaab001.
[3] Cerbo, S. (2016). Digital evidence changing the paradigm of human rights protection. Oisterwijk: Wolf Legal Publishers.
[4] Chan, G., & Magotiaux, S. (2021). Digital evidence. In B.H. Greenspan, & V. Rondinelli (Eds.). Toronto: Emond Publishing.
[5] Depauw, S. (2018). Electronic evidence in criminal matters: How about E-Evidence instruments 2.0? European Criminal Law Review (EuCLR), 8(1), 62-82. doi: 10.5771/2193-5505-2018-1-62.
[6] Dublin Core metadata element set version 1.1: Reference description. (1999). Retrieved from https://old.library.kr.ua/dc/dcmi1_1u.html.
[7] Fil, O., & Khoynatska, L. (2022). Looting as a way of waging war by the Russian Federation against Ukraine and a motivational factor for Russian servicemen. Ukrainian Historical Journal, 4, 129-138. doi: 10.15407/uhj2022.04.129.
[8] Gisel, L., Rodenhäuser, T., & Dörmann, K. (2020). Twenty years on: International humanitarian law and the protection of civilians against the effects of cyber operations during armed conflicts. International Review of the Red Cross, 102(913), 287-334. doi: 10.1017/S1816383120000387.
[9] Kancauskiene, J. (2019). Computer forensics and electronic evidence in criminal legal proceedings: Lithuania’s experience. Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review, 16, 11-24.
[10] Khashashneh, T., Al-Billeh, T., & Abu Issa, H. (2022). The authority of the criminal judge to assess digital (electronic) evidence in Jordanian, Egyptian, and French legislation. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 57(5), 631-640. doi: 10.35741/issn.0258-2724.57.5.51.
[11] Kostenko, M.V. (2019). Peculiarities of the innovative process in the field of criminology. In Materials of the international “round table” conference (pp. 72-75). Kharkiv: Pravo.
[12] Lasaka, M. (2023). Ius constituendum of electronic evidence arrangement in criminal procedure law. Journal of Legality, 16(2), 154-166.
[13] Latysh, K. (2022). Digital forensics during the war in Ukraine: Possibilities of using special knowledge in the field of information technologies. Mykolas Romeris University Research Management System (CRIS), 18, 18-21.
[14] Lewulis, P. (2021). Digital forensic standards and digital evidence in Polish criminal proceedings. An updated definition of digital evidence in forensic science. International Journal of Electronic Security and Digital Forensics, 13(4), article number 403. doi: 10.1504/IJESDF.2021.10034988.
[15] Mamedov, H. (2022). Digital forensics. How did it help gather evidence of the Bucha crimes? Retrieved from https://nv.ua/ukr/opinion/viyna-v-ukrajini-yak-cifrova-kriminalistika-vikrivaye-zlochini-rf-v-ukrajini-novini-ukrajini-50248411.html.
[16] Marcello, D. (2015). Evidence gathering in the realm of the European investigation order: From national rules to global principles. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 6(2), 179-194. doi: 10.1177/203228441500600203.
[17] Murzo, Ye.O. (2023). Peculiarities of the appointment and conduct of certain types of forensic examinations in the investigation of looting. In Criminal Justice: Current State and Development Prospects (pp. 185-187). Kyiv: National Academy of Internal Affairs.
[18] Okpara, J., Uguru, U., Agom, C., & Mgbolu, A. (2023). Admissibility of electronic evidence in criminal trials in Nigeria and the challenges of new crimes. AGORA International Journal of Juridical Sciences, 1, 28-46.
[19] Predmestnikov, O., Nazarenko, P., & Pershina, K. (2023). Criminal liability for pillage in wartime conditions (Ukrainian realities). Academic Visions, 20, 1-9. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8002682.
[20] Riekkinen, J. (2019). Electronic evidence in criminal procedure: On the effects of ICT and the development towards the network society on the life-cycle of evidence. Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review, 16, 6-10.
[21] Rojszczak, M. (2022). E-Evidence cooperation in criminal matters from an EU perspective. Modern Law Review, 85(4), 997-1028. doi: 10.1111/1468-2230.12749.
[22] Sabadin, A. (2021). How to submit an electronic proof to be accepted? Retrieved from https://yur-gazeta. com/publications/practice/sudova-praktika/yak-podati-elektronniy-dokaz-abi-yogo-priynyali.html.
[23] Shepitko, V., & Shepitko, M. (2021). Doctrine of criminalistics and forensic examination: Formation, current state and development in Ukraine. Law of Ukraine, 8, 12-27.
[24] Stefaniv, N. (2022). Judicial practice of the Supreme Court of Ukraine regarding the admissibility of electronic evidence. Retrieved from https://supreme.court.gov.ua/userfiles/media/new_folder_for_uploads/ supreme/Prezentatsiia_Stefaniv.pdf.
[25] Tosza, S. (2020). All evidence is equal, but electronic evidence is more equal than any other: The relationship between the European Investigation Order and the European Production Order. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 11(2), 161-183. doi: 10.1177/2032284420919802
[26] Wang, B., & Liu, Y. (2019). Collection and judgment of electronic data evidence in criminal cases: From the perspective of investigation and evidence collection by public security organs. Journal of Forensic Science and Medicine, 5(4), 187-194. doi: 10.4103/jfsm.jfsm_26_19.
[27] Yanovska, O. (2022). The procedure for collecting and recording e-evidence must necessarily involve computer technology specialists. Retrieved from https://radako.com.ua/news/procedura-zboru-ta-fiksaciyi-e- dokaziv-obovyazkovo-maie-vklyuchati-fahivciv-kompyuternih.