en

Scientific Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs

  • Received 10.12.2025,
  • Revised 03.03.2026,
  • Accepted 31.03.2026
  • Published 02.04.2026
Download article Download article
Vol. 31, No. 1, 2026
  • psychocorrection; combat stress; post-traumatic stress disorder; anxiety; adaptability; systemic approach
  • https://doi.org/10.63341/naia-herald/1.2026.94
  • Pages 94-103

The aim of the study was to investigate the levels of traumatic stress, anxiety and depression, and the impact of stress factors on the psycho-emotional state of military personnel, as well as to evaluate the effectiveness of a comprehensive psychocorrectional programme. The study was conducted on a sample of 50 assault troops, divided into an experimental group (25 individuals) and a control group (25 individuals). A repeated-measures experimental design was employed. The psychocorrection programme, which consisted of eight group training sessions (90 minutes each), was based on the systemic approach developed by I. Kotenev. The instruments used included I. Kotenev’s “Traumatic Stress Questionnaire, the “Short AD-PTSD Scale” and the “Stress Factors” method. The results confirmed the high effectiveness of the programme: according to the “Short AD-PTSD Scale”, in the experimental group the level of anxiety decreased by 42.9% (from 14.2 to 8.1 points), the level of depression decreased by 40.8% (from 12.5 to 7.4 points), and PTSD symptoms decreased by 42.3% (from 16.8 to 9.7 points). The total average score of affirmative responses indicating the presence of disturbances decreased from 5.28 to 1.78, which moved the majority of servicemen out of the risk zone. The overall level of stress load, determined using the “Stress Factors” method, decreased by almost 30% (from 4.16 to 2.98 points). The most noticeable reduction in psycho-emotional tension was recorded in the areas of personal-psychological and emotional-physiological reactions (a decrease of 33.3% and 31.9% respectively). Positive changes were also observed in internal resources: the subjective feeling of calmness and inner balance increased by 78.5%, social cohesion increased by 36.6%, and self-control improved by 31.0%. After completion of the programme, 82% of participants reported an improvement in sleep quality, and 76% reported increased concentration of attention. In the control group, which did not receive the intervention, no significant positive changes were observed. This demonstrates that natural adaptation is insufficient to overcome the consequences of combat stress. The programme significantly increases the adaptability of military personnel, stabilises their emotional state, and may be integrated into psychoprophylactic programmes within units of the Armed Forces of Ukraine

References

  1. [1] Ahaiev, N.A., Kokun, O.M., Pishko, I.O., Lozinska, N.S., Ostapchuk, V.V., & Tkachenko, V.V. (2016). Collection of methods for diagnosing negative mental states of military personnel: Methodological manual. Kyiv: Research Center for Humanitarian Problems of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
  2. American Sociological Association’s Code of Ethic. (1997). Retrieved from https://www.asanet.org/wp-content/uploads/savvy/images/asa/docs/pdf/CodeofEthics.pdf.
  3. Art of Living Research. (2023). Scientific research on SKY Breath Meditation: Physical and mental health benefits. Retrieved from https://www.aolresearch.org/SKY_research_summary_01052023.pdf.
  4. Balban, M.Y., Neri, E., Kogon, M.M., Zeitzer, J.M., Spiegel, D., & Huberman, A.D. (2023). Brief structured respiration practices enhance mood and reduce physiological arousal. Cell Reports Medicine, 4(1). doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100895.
  5. Blinov, O.A. (2019). Combat mental trauma. Kyiv, Ukraine: Talkom.
  6. Blinov, O.A., & Blinova, O.B. (2006). Study of the level of fear in a personality during responsible activity. Collection of Scientific Papers of Kyiv International University. Series: Psychological Sciences, 9, 33-38.
  7. Diomidova, N.Y. (2021). Effectiveness of the metaphorical associative cards “Overcoming” in developing personal stress resistance. Bulletin of H. S. Skovoroda KhNPU. Psychology, 65, 251-261. doi: 10.34142/23129387.2021.65.16.
  8. Kitaiev-Smyk, L.A. (2020). Stress: Emotions and somatics. Kyiv: Academic Project.
  9. Klochkov, V. (Ed.). (2023). Collection of standards for psychological training in the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Kyiv: Research Center for Humanitarian Problems of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
  10. Kokun, O.M., Klochkov, V.V., Moroz, V.M., Pishko, I.O., & Lozinska, N.S. (2022a). Ensuring psychological resilience of servicemen in combat conditions. Kyiv-Odesa: Phoenix.
  11. Kokun, O.M., Moroz, V.M., Pishko, I.O., & Lozinska, N.S. (2022b). Theory and practice of fear management in combat conditions. Kyiv-Odesa: Phoenix.
  12. Kokun, O.M., Klochkov, V.V., Moroz, V.M., Pishko, I.O., & Lozinska, N.S. (2023). Ensuring the psychological stability of military personnel in combat conditions: A methodological manual. Kyiv: Center for Educational Literature.
  13. Kononova, M.M., & Kuchma, T.V. (2021). Essence of stress as a psychological category. Young Scientist, 1(89), 28-32. doi: 10.32839/2304-5809/2021-1-89-6.
  14. Liashch, O.P. (2021). Destructive influence of combat stress on the emotional sphere of a serviceman’s personality. Psychological Prospects, 37, 128-140. doi: 10.29038/2227-1376-2021-37-128-140.
  15. Mahour, J., & Verma, P. (2017). Effect of Ujjayi pranayama on cardiovascular autonomic function tests. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 7(4), 391-395. doi: 10.5455/njppp.2017.7.1029809122016.
  16. Moroz, V.M., Koval, M.A., & Herasymenko, O.V. (2023). Collection of methods for psychological diagnostics of servicemen of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Kyiv: Research Center for Humanitarian Problems of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
  17. Prykhodko, I.I. (2021). Prevention and control of combat stress in servicemen: Systematization of research. Bulletin of H. S. Skovoroda KhNPU. Psychology, 1(64), 193-215. doi: 10.33405/2078-7480/2021/1/76/229732.
  18. Public Health Center of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine. (n.d.). Psychological support of U.S. military personnel and their families. Retrieved from https://phc.org.ua/news/psikhologichna-pidtrimka-viyskovikh-ssha-ta-ikhnikh-rodin-psikholog-bryus-krou-pid-chas-vizitu.
  19. Stasiuk, V.V., & Ukrainets, V.M. (2023a). Historical and psychological analysis of the stress phenomenon. Bulletin of the National Defence University of Ukraine, 1(71), 126-133. doi: 10.33099/2617-6858-23-71-1-126-133.
  20. Stasiuk, V.V., & Ukrainets, V.M. (2023b). Essence of stress resistance in psychological science. Habitus, 48, 60-65. doi: 10.32782/2663-5208.
  21. Ulianov, K. (2020). Armored mind: Combat stress and psychology of extreme situations. Kyiv: UkrSich.
  22. Vasylenko, S.V. (2020). Features of the influence of stressogenic conditions of professional activity on the psyche of servicemen of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Bulletin of the National Defence University of Ukraine, 54, 45-49. doi: 10. 33099/2617-6858-20-54-1-45-50.
  23. Verba, A.V., Barbaziuk, O.A., & Shvets, A.V. (2017). Guidelines for preserving the mental health of servicemen in the deployment zone and during restoration of combat capability of military units. Kyiv: Main Military Medical Directorate, Ukrainian Military Medical Academy.
  24. Zhuk, N. (2023). Stress resistance of employees as an important factor of the psychological climate in a team. In Proceedings of the international scientific and practical conference “Theoretical and practical aspects of science, education and society development” (pp. 46-48). Rivne: CFEND.