- revision, auditor, specialist, special knowledge, misappropriation, waste of property, seizure of property, abuse of official position, office theft
- https://doi.org/10.33270/01211203.35
- Pages 35-47
The purpose of the article is to study the audit as a type of use of special knowledge in the investigation of the misappropriation, waste of property or taking possession of it through abuse of office; disclosure of the grounds for appointment, the mechanism for conducting and formalizing the results of an audit in criminal proceedings; determination of the status of the auditor conducting the audit in the course of the pre-trial investigation. Methodology. In the article a set of scientific methods is used, namely: terminological, systemic-structural, formal-logical, comparative legal. Scientific novelty. It has been established that conducting an audit is a type of procedural form of using special knowledge in criminal proceedings. An auditor, as an official of the state financial control body, who conducts an audit in accordance with the procedure established by law, is a specialist in criminal procedural meaning. A specialist auditor possesses special economic, accounting, commodity knowledge, special knowledge in the field of financial and budget reporting, knowledge and skills in the field of forensic records management. Conclusions. Revision in the investigation of misappropriation, embezzlement or seizure of property through abuse of official position is a method of collecting evidence, which, together with other data, constitutes the subject of proof in criminal proceedings. Auditing is an effective means of detecting official thefts and signs of their concealment. To conduct an audit in the course of investigating the misappropriation, embezzlement of property or taking possession of it through abuse of official position, in addition to the auditor, it is advisable to additionally involve other specialists
References
[1] Artemova, A.N. (2020). Legal consequences of abuse of the right when using the structure of the corporation by its controlling persons. Eurasian Law Journal, 12(151), 143-145. doi: 10.46320/2073-4506-2020-12-151-143-145.
[2] Bakhin, V.P., & Volobuieva, O.O. (2005). Interaction of the investigator with specialists during the inspection of the scene (collection of information about the person who committed the crime): Scientific-practical. recommendations). Donetsk: Dyui.
[3] Biriukov, S.Iu., Shinkaruk, V.M., & Shmatov, M.A. (2020). Organizational and tactical aspects of initiating a criminal case and conducting a preliminary investigation at the initial stage on the facts of causing property damage by deception or abuse of trust committed in the field of production, transmission and sale of electricity. Legal Paradigm, 19(1), 112-119. doi: 10.15688/lc.jvolsu.2020.1.16.
[4] Bishmanov, B.M. (2006). Expert and specialist in criminal proceedings. Moscow: Mosk. Psikhol.-sots. in-t.
[5] Bondarenko, O.O. (2004). Procedural status of informed persons and their legal relations with the coroner and the investigator in criminal proceedings of Ukraine the dissertation. Candidate’s thesis. Kharkiv: National University.
[6] Deborah, D.S, Kimberly, C.G., & Yezen, H.K., (2021). Auditor liability and excess cash holdings: Evidence from audit fees of foreign incorporated firms. International Review of Financial Analysis, 10. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101947.
[7] Dolinko, V.I. (2020). Criminal liability for abuse in procurement for state and municipal needs. Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 3(51), 171-179. doi: 10.36511/2078-5356-2020-3-171-179.
[8] Dulov, A.V. (1959). Forensic theory issues. Minsk: National University.
[9] Galushkin, V.I. (2012). Legal and forensic aspects of the use of audits and inspections in the detection and investigation of crimes. Moscow: Iurlitinform.
[10] Gangwani, M. (2020). Suitability of forensic accounting in uncovering bank frauds in India: An opinion survey. Journal of Financial Crime, 28(1), 284-299. doi: 10.1108/JFC-07-2020-0126.
[11] Goldman, A.M. (1970). Legal grounds and forms of application of special knowledge in the Soviet criminal process. In Expertise in the Work of a Defense Attorney: Proceedings of the Conference (pp. 27-44). Leningrad: National University.
[12] Kaban, İs. (2020). Central audit activities as a continuous audit approach in the Turkish banking sector: A case study. About frauds in savings accounts. Öneri Dergisi, 15(53), 254-275. doi: 10.14783/maruoneri.676406.
[13] Kalinkin, Iu.A. (1980). Participation in criminal proceedings of persons with special knowledge. State University Bulletin, 3, 56-61. [14] Kamlyk, M.I. (2003). Forensic accounting (4th ed., rev.). Kyiv: Atika.
[15] Khavroniuk, M.I. (2019). Corruption schemes: Their criminal qualification and pre-trial investigation. Kyiv: Moskalenko O.M.
[16] Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine. No. 4651-VI. (2012, April). Retrieved from http://zakon0. rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17
[17] Lisichenko, V.K., & Tsirkal, V.V. (1987). Use of special knowledge in investigative and judicial practice manual. Kyiv: National University.
[18] Lukianchykov, Ye.D. (2014). Forms of using special knowledge under the new CPC of Ukraine. Kyiv: KPI.
[19] Matveev, I.V. (2019). Problems of qualification of abuse of office. In Actual Problems of Combating Crime: Issues of Theory and Practice: Proceedings of the 22 International Scientific and Practical Conference (pp. 241-243). Krasnoiarsk: Sibir. iurid. in-t. doi: 10.51980/2019_1_241.
[20] Muminova-Savina, H.H. (2003). Forensic accounting guide. Kyiv: National University.
[21] Order of the Main Control and Revision Department, the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the Security Service of Ukraine, the Prosecutor General’s Office of Ukraine “About the statement of the Order of interaction between bodies of the state control and audit service and bodies of prosecutor’s office, bodies of internal affairs and Security service of Ukraine”. No. 346/1025/685/53. (2006, October). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z1166-06#Text.
[22] Order of the Ministry of Emergencies and Protection of the Population from the Consequences of the Chernobyl Accident “About the statement of the Situation on the procedure for carrying out check of activity of emergency rescue services and their readiness to react to emergency situations”. No. 61. (2002, March). Retrieved from http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0309-02.
[23] Nehanov, V.V. (2018). Use of conclusions of audits in criminal proceedings. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kyiv: National University.
[24] Nehanov, V.V. (2018). Use of conclusions of audits in criminal proceedings. Candidate’s thesis. Kyiv: National University.
[25] Pasovets, E.Iu., & Demchenko, D.A. (2020). Theft by abuse of power: On the issue of reducing corruption risks in the authorities and departments of emergency situations. Bulletin of the University of Civil Protection of the Ministry of Emergencies of Belarus, 4(1), 106-114. doi: 10.33408/2519-237X.2020.4-1.106.
[26] Piaskovskyi, V.V., Chornous, Yu.M., & Samodin, A.V. (2020). Forensics textbook. Kyiv: Pravo.
[27] Ponikarov, V.D. (2005). Forensic economic examination. Kharkiv: Inzhen.
[28] Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine “On approval of the Regulations on the State Audit Service of Ukraine” No. 43. (2016, February). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/43-2016-%D0%BF#Text.
[29] Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine “About the statement of the Procedure for carrying out inspection by the State financial inspection, its territorial bodies”. No. 550. (2006, April). Retrieved from http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/550-2006-п.
[30] Romaniuk, B.V. (2002). Modern theoretical and legal problems of using special knowledge in pre-trial investigation. Candidate’s thesis. Kyiv: National University.
[31] Selina, E. (2002). Forms of application of special knowledge in criminal proceedings. Legality, 5, 23-26.
[32] Shapiro, L.G. (2007). Procedural and forensic aspects of the use of special knowledge in the investigation of crimes in the field of economic activity. Moscow: Iurlitinform.
[33] Shcherbakovskyi, M.H. (2020). Conducting and using forensic examinations in criminal proceedings. Kharkiv: V dele.
[34] Shramko, O.M. (2020). Conducting audits and inspections as types of use of special knowledge in the investigation of corruption crimes in Ukraine. KELM, 3-2, 133-138.
[35] Shramko, O.M. (2021). The use of special knowledge in the investigation of corruption offenses. Candidate’s thesis. Kyiv: National University.
[36] Sorokotiagin, I.N. (1984). Special knowledge in crime investigation. Rostov n/D: National University.
[37] Case No. 127/3790/16 in the archives of the Vinnytsia City Court of the Vinnytsia Region.
[38] Case No. 127/929/16-k in the archives of the Vinnytsia City Court of the Vinnytsia Region.
[39] Case No. 127/9504/17 in the archives of the Vinnytsia City Court of the Vinnytsia Region.
[40] Case No. 607/11911/19 in the archives of the Ternopil Court of Appeal.
[41] Vorobeva, S.V., & Chikalina, V.A. (2020). Features of signs of corpus delicti and their significance for qualifying abuse and abuse of office. Trends in the Development of Science and Education, 5, 22- 25. doi: 10.18411/lj-05-2020-234.
[42] Voronov, S.S., & Golubiatnikov, S.P. (2020). Use of economic information in identifying and proving abuse of power. Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 4(52), 59-63. doi: 10.36511/2078-5356-2020-4-59-63.
[43] Vronskaia, M.V., & Dibaeva, S.E. (2019). The use of the phenomenon of abuse of law in the practice of the Federal Antimonopoly Service of Russia in resolving disputes in the field of corporate procurement of goods, works and services. Administrative and Municipal Law, 4, 15-26. doi: 10.7256/2454-0595.2019.4.30200.
[44] Unified report of the Office of the Prosecutor General on criminal offenses in Ukraine for January-December 2020. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.gp.gov.ua/ua/stat_n_st?dir_ id=114140&libid=100820&c=edit&_c=fo
[45] Law of Ukraine “On the basic principles of public financial control in Ukraine”. No. 2939-XII. (1993, January). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2939-12#Text
[46] Zapototskyi, A. (2017). Unscheduled on-site audit as a way to use special knowledge in the investigation of crimes in the field of construction. Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law 5, 231-234.