- криптовалюта; шахрайство; цифрова криміналістика; деанонімізація; блокчейн
- https://doi.org/10.63341/naia-herald/2.2025.119
- Сторінки 119-137
The purpose of this study was to identify the most effective approaches to investigating crimes related to virtual assets based on a comparative analysis of international practices. The study was based on a systematic analysis of legislative acts and regulatory documents. Comparative legal analysis methods were used to study the regulatory approaches of different jurisdictions, a systematic approach was used to study the interrelationships between the elements of the crime prevention system, and a structural-functional study of the role of various actors was conducted. The study revealed a critical lack of a single international definition of virtual assets, which creates gaps in criminal law classification, particularly with regard to Article 209 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, and procedures for the seizure and confiscation of assets in cross-border cases. It was found that the greatest investigative effectiveness is achieved through the multi-level integration of proactive approaches to monitoring virtual asset service providers, reactive measures by law enforcement agencies, the use of specialised software such as Chainalysis, TRM Lab, Crystal Blockchain, and Elliptic for blockchain analysis, and open intelligence methods. The study systematises specific forensic indicators of five main types of crimes related to virtual assets, including transaction structuring in money laundering, the use of mixers, promises of unrealistic returns in investment fraud, and links to darknet addresses. A comparative analysis of five key jurisdictions demonstrated a striking diversity of regulatory approaches, ranging from technology-neutral Swiss regulation based on principles to comprehensive regulation of European crypto asset markets with uniform requirements for crypto asset service providers. The practical significance of the results obtained lies in the possibility of developing effective mechanisms for international cooperation in the investigation of cross-border crimes related to virtual assets
Використані джерела
[1] Agarwal, U., Rishiwal, V., Tanwar, S., & Yadav, M. (2024). Blockchain and crypto forensics: Investigating crypto frauds. International Journal of Network Management, 34(2), article number e2255. doi: 10.1002/nem.2255.
[2] Al Ali, T., Alfulaiti, S., Abuzour, M., Almaqahami, S., & Ikuesan, R. (2023). Digital forensic in a virtual world: A case of metaverse and VR. In ECCWS 2023 22nd European conference on cyber warfare and security (pp. 12-21). Reading: Academic Conferences and Publishing Limited.
[3] Alshurafat, H., Shbail, M.O.A., & Almuiet, M. (2024). Factors affecting the intention to adopt IT forensic accounting tools to detect financial cybercrimes. International Journal of Business Excellence, 33(2), 169-190. doi: 10.1504/IJBEX.2024.139917.
[4] Arzt, C., Hirschmann, N., Hunold, D., Lüders, S., Meißelbach, C., Schöne, M., Sticher, B. (Eds.). (2021). Perspectives on police research. FÖPS Berlin. Berlin: Arbeitskreis Empirische Polizeiforschung. doi: 10.4393/opushwr-3370.
[5] BKA. (2025). Accessible organisational chart of the Federal Criminal Police Office. Retrieved from https://www.bka.de/DE/DasBKA/OrganisationAufbau/Organigramm/organigramm_node.html.
[6] Blockchain Intelligence Group. (2025). Law enforcement resource guide for cryptocurrency investigations. Retrieved from https://blockchaingroup.io/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Law-Enforcement-Resource-Guide-for-Cryptocurrency-Investigations-.pdf.
[7] Charltons Quantum. (2025). An overview of the regulation of virtual assets in Singapore. Retrieved from https://charltonsquantum.com/wp-content/uploads/docs/singapore-crypto-guide.pdf.
[8] Committee of Experts on the Evaluation of Anti-Money Laundering Measures and the Financing of Terrorism. (2023). Typologies report on money laundering and terrorist financing risks in the world of virtual assets. Strasburg: Council of Europe.
[9] COPOLAD. (2025). Navigating cryptocurrency-driven crime: A guide for law enforcement. Retrieved from https://copolad.eu/en/cryptocurrency-law-enforcement/.
[10] Cryptocurrency Bitcoin: Means of payment or financial instrument from the perspective of BaFin? (2019). Retrieved from https://www.roedl.de/themen/rechtsberatung/kryptowaehrung-bitcoin-zahlungsmittel-finanzinstrument-bafin.
[11] Drobotov, S., Pertsev, R., Hrab, M., Fedytnyk, V., Moroz, S., & Kikalishvili, M. (2023). Forensic research of the computer tools and systems in the fight against cybercrime. Journal of Information Technology Management, 15(1), 135-162. doi: 10.22059/jitm.2023.90741.
[12] Efuntade, A.O., & Efuntade, O. (2023). Internet payment system, forensic accounting and forensic investigation: 3M theory in the financial frauds. Journal of Accounting and Financial Management, 9(7), 115-130. doi: 10.56201/ijssmr.v8.no1.2022.pg32.40.
[13] Europol. (2025a). The changing DNA of serious and organised crime. Retrieved from https://fiaumalta.org/app/uploads/2025/03/Mar-2025-Serious-and-Organised-Crime-Threat-Assessment-SOCTA-2025_Part1.pdf.
[14] Europol. (2025b). Internet Organised Crime Threat Assessment (IOCTA). Retrieved from https://www.europol.europa.eu/cms/sites/default/files/documents/Steal-deal-repeat-IOCTA_2025.pdf.
[15] Faqir, R.S. (2023). Digital criminal investigations in the era of artificial intelligence: A comprehensive overview. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 17(2), 77-94.
[16] FATF. (2021). Updated guidance for a risk-based approach for virtual assets and virtual asset service providers. Paris: FATF.
[17] Fennych, V.P. (2022). Evaluation of electronic evidence in civil proceedings (on examples of specific categories of court cases). Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University. Law Series, 71, 63. doi: 10.24144/2307-3322.2022.71.63.
[18] Financial Action Task Force. (2024). Virtual assets: Targeted update on implementation of the FATF standards on virtual assets and virtual asset service providers. Paris: FATF.
[19] FINMA. (2022). Fact sheet: Cryptoassets. Retrieved from https://www.finma.ch/en/~/media/finma/dokumente/dokumentencenter/myfinma/faktenblaetter/faktenblatt-kryptobasierte-vermoegenswerte.pdf.
[20] Grigg, G. (2025). Law enforcement in the age of cryptocurrency. Retrieved from https://www.police1.com/investigations/law-enforcement-in-the-age-of-cryptocurrency.
[21] Hamad, N., & Eleyan, D. (2022). Digital forensics tools used in cybercrime investigation-comparative analysis. Journal of Xiʼan University of Architecture & Technology, 14(4), 113-127.
[22] Hlynska, N., & Klepka, D.I. (2022). Digitization of criminal proceedings: current aspects of conceptualization (part 1). Issues of Crime Prevention, 1(43).
[23] Hossain, M.Z. (2023). Emerging trends in forensic accounting: Data analytics, cyber forensic accounting, cryptocurrencies, and blockchain technology for fraud investigation and prevention. SSRN. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4450488.
[24] HSI New York hosts 1st Annual Cyber Crime Symposium. (2019). Retrieved from https://www.ice.gov/news/releases/hsi-new-york-hosts-1st-annual-cyber-crime-symposium.
[25] INTERPOL. (2024). Global financial fraud assessment. Retrieved from https://www.interpol.int/en/content/download/21077/file/24COM005563-01%20-%20CAS_Global%20Financial%20Fraud%20Assessment_Public%20version_2024-03%20v2.pdf.
[26] ISO/IEC 27043:2015 “Information technology – Security techniques – Incident investigation principles and processes”. (2015). Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/44407.html.
[27] IVPN. (2025). Online privacy through OPSEC and compartmentalization – Part 3. Retrieved from https://www.ivpn.net/privacy-guides/online-privacy-through-opsec-and-compartmentalization-part-3/.
[28] Jitariuc, V., & Nastas, A. (2022). Forensic features of cybercrime. Romanian Journal of Forensic Science, 4, 286-294.
[29] Kamenskyi, D.V., & Dudorov, O.O. (2024). Laundering criminal proceeds through virtual currency transactions: A new threat to economic security. Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence, 1, 500-509. doi: 10.24144/2788-6018.2024.01.88.
[30] Karagiannis, C., & Vergidis, K. (2021). Digital evidence and cloud forensics: Contemporary legal challenges and the power of disposal. Information, 12(5), article number 181. doi: 10.3390/info12050181.
[31] Kazaure, A.A., Yusoff, M.N., & Jantan, A. (2023). Digital forensics investigation approaches in mitigating cybercrimes: A review. Journal of Information Science Theory & Practice (JIStaP), 11(4). doi: 10.1633/JISTaP.2023.11.4.2.
[32] Law Business Research. (2024). Switzerland: Cryptoassets & blockchain. Retrieved from https://mll-legal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Switzerland-Cryptoassets-Blockchain.pdf.
[33] Lott, R. (2025). Darknet orders of narcotics: Criminal law risks in 2025 – specialist lawyer explains. Retrieved from https://www.rechtsanwalt-lott.de/darknet-bestellungen-von-betaeubungsmitteln-strafrechtliche-risiken-2025-fachanwalt-klaert-auf/.
[34] Mirza, M.M., Ozer, A., & Karabiyik, U. (2022). Mobile cyber forensic investigations of Web3 wallets on Android and iOS. Applied Sciences, 12(21), article number 11180. doi: 10.3390/app122111180.
[35] Mishra, A.K., Hemamalini, V., & Tyagi, A.K. (2024). Digital forensics with emerging technologies: Vision and research potential for future. In Conversational artificial intelligence (pp. 675-697) (pp. 675-697). doi: 10.1002/9781394200801.ch37.
[36] Ombu, A. (2023). Role of digital forensics in combating financial crimes in the computer era. Journal of Forensic Accounting Profession, 3(1), 57-75. doi: 10.2478/jfap-2023-0003.
[37] OSCE. (2024). Decoding crypto crime: A guide for law enforcement (table of contents & excerpts). Vienna: OSCE.
[38] OSINT Industries Team. (2025). What is dark web intelligence (DARKInt)? A beginnerʼs guide. Retrieved from https://www.osint.industries/post/what-is-dark-web-intelligence-darkint-beginners-guide
[39] Ovsіanіuk, D., & Ustymenko, O. (2024). Exchange of information as a form of international cooperation in combating drug trafficking. Novum Jus, 18(1), 181-216. doi: 10.14718/NovumJus.2024.18.1.7
[40] Ovsіanіuk, D. (2024). Intelligence cycle as the basis of analytical activity in combating drug-related crime. Law Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, 14(2), 95-104. doi: 10.56215/naia-chasopis/2.2024.95.
[41] Rawtani, D., & Hussain, C.M. (Eds.). (2023). Modern forensic tools and devices: Trends in criminal investigation. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
[42] Saharan, S., Singh, S., Bhandari, A.K., & Yadav, B. (2024). The future of Cyber-Crimes and cyber war in the metaverse. In Forecasting cyber crimes in the age of the metaverse (pp. 126-148). Hershey: IGI Global Scientific Publishing. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-0220-0.ch007.
[43] Salamakha, R. (2024). Cryptocurrency and criminal proceedings: unusual cases of judicial practice. Retrieved from https://yur-gazeta.com/dumka-eksperta/kript ovalyuta-ta-kriminalni-provadzhennya-nezvichni-keysi-sudovoyi-praktiki.html.
[44] Saleh, M., Othman, S.H., Driss, M., Al-dhaqm, A., Ali, A., Yafooz, W.M., & Emara, A.H.M. (2023). A metamodeling approach for IoT forensic investigation. Electronics, 12(3), article number 524. doi: 10.3390/electronics12030524.
[45] Samsin, R.I. (2024). Classification of virtual assets. Central Ukrainian Bulletin of Law and Public Administration, 2(6), 90-98. doi: 10.32782/cuj-2024-2-12.
[46] Schmidt, A. (2021). Virtual assets: Compelling a new anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing regulatory model. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 29(4), 332-363. doi: 10.1093/ijlit/eaac001.
[47] Schwarz, N., Chen, M.K., Poh, M.K., Jackson, M.G., Kao, K., Fernando, M.F., & Markevych, M. (2021). Virtual assets and anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism: Some legal and practical considerations. Washington: International Monetary Fund.
[48] Seo, S., Seok, B., & Lee, C. (2023). Digital forensic investigation framework for the metaverse. The Journal of Supercomputing, 79(9), 9467-9485. doi: 10.1007/s11227-023-05045-1.
[49] SQUIRE Patton Boggs. (2025). Update of German law aspects of crypto assets. Retrieved from update-of-german-law-aspects-of-crypto-assets.pdf.
[50] Stoykova, R., & Franke, K. (2023). Reliability validation enabling framework (RVEF) for digital forensics in criminal investigations. Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation, 45, article number 301554. doi: 10.1016/j.fsidi.2023.301554.
[51] Sun, D., Zhang, X., Choo, K. K. R., Hu, L., & Wang, F. (2021). NLP-based digital forensic investigation platform for online communications. Computers & Security, 104, article number 102210. doi: 10.1016/j.cose.2021.102210.
[52] Supreme Court judge spoke about judicial practice regarding the evaluation of electronic evidence in criminal proceedings within the HELP course “Cybercrime and electronic evidence”. (2021). Retrieved from https://supreme.court.gov.ua/supreme/pres-centr/news/1750192/.
[53] TRM. (n.d.). Enhancing law enforcementʼs role in expanding the U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. Retrieved from https://www.trmlabs.com/resources/blog/enhancing-law-enforcements-role-in-expanding-the-us-strategic-bitcoin-reserve.
[54] Tsai, F.C. (2021). The application of blockchain of custody in criminal investigation process. Procedia Computer Science, 192, 2779-2788. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.09.048.
[55] Wu, J., Lin, K., Lin, D., Zheng, Z., Huang, H., & Zheng, Z. (2023). Financial crimes in web3-empowered metaverse: Taxonomy, countermeasures, and opportunities. IEEE Open Journal of the Computer Society, 4, 37-49. doi: 10.1109/OJCS.2023.3245801.
[56] Yarotskyi, V.O. (2023). Concepts and types of virtual assets that may be in circulation according to the legislation of Ukraine. Scientific Notes of V.I. Vernadsky Ternopil National University. Series: Legal Sciences, 34(3), 101-107. doi: 10.32782/TNU-2707-0581/2023.4/15.